Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Engagement Panel
Public Comments
Date | Decommissioning Topic | Comment / Suggestion: | Group Affiliation, if any (Optional) | Uploaded File 1 | Uploaded File 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 11, 2020 | Lands | Will Costal commission regulations apply to Native Americans Sovereign lands ? | |||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | Please ask the rep from San Luis Obispo County Planning comment regarding cpuc tribal lands policy... Sovereign Nation status, Chumash Casino Santa Ynez etc | |||
March 11, 2020 | Community Outreach Process | Michael A. Khus-zarate To Whom It May Concern, I grew up on the Central Coast where my family has always resided and still do so. I now live in the Fresno area and work as an educator at Clovis Unified School District. However, I maintain close ties with my family and tribal members on the central coast. Former Member, Congressional Advisory Council on California Indian Policy * Note: there is no scientific or government consensus on the definition of “tribe”. In California the term is used loosely to describe family-clan groups and multiple family groups. | Northern Chumash Bear Clan | Diablo-Ltr-PUC.docx | |
March 11, 2020 | Lands | Because of the power plant, the 12,000 acres of land remain some of the most pristine lands in California. These lands should be kept as open space, with multi-use trails (coastal, inland and a few in-between trails). Integrating the lands into the existing Montana de Oro State Park, or creating a new National Seashore (similar to Pt Reyes National Seashore) would make the most sense. Incorporating Wild Cherry Canyon into the park, or to be sold to the Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo, would be the icing on the cake. Protection of sensitive cultural, flora and fauna must also happen. The Chumash would be good stewards, but I have concerns about their potential ability to develop projects, such as a casino, with minimum public input. | Atascadero Horsemen’s Club | ||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | I am in support of the in-perpetuity conservation of the 12,000 acres of Diablo Canyon Lands. As a local teacher and mother, I care about the world we are leaving for our children. Here we have a chance to preserve one of the last, coastal stretches of natural California for ourselves and future generations. The county of San Luis Obispo is unique due to its prioritization of land conservation. On any given weekend, the cars of people who are eager to explore nature fill the parking lots of our numerous open spaces. This increases the vitality, health, and well-being of our communities. Support for the conservation of public lands is further reflected in The Dream Initiate of 2000 (passed by nearly 75% of SLO County residents called for the conservation of and public access to the Diablo Canyon Lands once the plant closes. In addition, as a public park, the land can generate tourism dollars to support the local economy. Protection of the Diablo Canyon Lands not only gives people recreational access to thousands of acres, it also enables a 20 plus mile coastal trail stretching from Avila Beach to Montana de Oro. And, importantly, the Diablo Canyon Lands are truly unique from an ecological perspective – much of Coastal California has been forever lost to run-away, ill-conceived development. I ask PG&E and County of San Luis Obispo to enact the conservation of and public access to the Diablo Canyon Lands This is what the community has asked for, and it is what the community deserves. | |||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | Can a conservation easement be attached and recorded to any PG&E land prior to any transfer away from PG&E? | |||
March 11, 2020 | San Luis Obispo | To the Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Engagement Panel: Over the past 36 years I have been welcomed at many ceremonies led by Michael Khus-zarate and his mother Pilulaw Khus in Diablo Canyon, Painted Rock on the Carrizo Plain, Cayucos Beach, and other places important to the Northern Chumash Bear Clan. I had planned to attend your 3/11/20 meeting to read a letter from Michael because he could not attend. You should have that letter. I'm writing this to reiterate these points: 1. It is important that you include Michael Bear-Walking Khus-zarate of the Northern Chumash Bear Clan and Fred Collins of the Northern Chumash Tribal Council in the process for PARTY STATUS regarding (PG&E application A18-12-008). 2. The Chumash were a large and varied group united by language and culture, who inhabited the lands from north of Morro Bay to Malibu and from the Channel Islands to the San Gabriel Mountains for thousands of years before the Europeans came. Their descendants are still here, but Native American lineage is complicated because an estimated nine out of ten Native people were killed or died of disease throughout California and the whole United States, mostly during the 1800s, and the remainder dispersed. 3. Today, there is no one group that exclusively represents coastal California Native peoples. Various Chumash groups exist, but all represent the diverse composition of Native Californians that is the reality today. 4. I want to see the lands surrounding Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant protected and preserved. Its unique and increasingly rare habitats, and the wildlife who live here, must not be subjected to development. Thank you very much for your work. Sincerely, | |||
March 11, 2020 | San Luis Obispo | Dear esteemed and hard-working Panel, Being in attendance for a recent presentation at a Mothers for Peace meeting, reading the current local Sierra Club newsletter, as well as reading today's editorial in the Tribune, one would wonder at the furious attempt to gain support to upend the new Land Policy decision of the CPUC. Instead of recognizing the progressive decision made with this ruling, efforts are being directed to once again put limitations, in perpetuity, on possible land acquisition by the local Native American Tribe. There seems to be a basic underlying fear or mistrust directing all these efforts. I wonder where this fear comes from- certainly our families have proven themselves capable of being good stewards of the land, as we all should know the history of this area and our role as being successful caretakers of this land for thousands of years. The fear of development? Our inherent responsibility to this land is preservation and conservation. Our history of working with the Land Conservancy of SLO has succeeded in providing managed public access to the Pismo Preserve- and yet, efforts have already been needed to thwart folks from “loving a place to death.” Even so, what we have stated from the beginning of this journey in presenting to the Engagement Panel is to include managed public access in our plans. We honor the incredible beauty and gift of these lands, and want others to honor them as well. So where does this fear come from? Just as our DNA holds the life blood and spirit of those who came before us, so also does the DNA of all who are on this panel. Just as we are willing to fight for the return of our homelands, so also is there seemingly some sort of historical replication in some for seeking control over our behavior and actions. I would ask the panel to support the CPUC tribal lands policy as written, as it aligns beautifully with the vision document of this decommissioning engagement panel. Thank you all for you continuing work. It has and continues to make a difference. Sincerely, Wendy Lucas | yttyt Northern Chumash | ||
March 11, 2020 | Los Osos | 1801 Ferrell Ave. These are some of the most pristine lands on the central coast. Do Not sell them off for building Mc mansions and Mega hotels. These lands should be given back to the native americans as this was all theirs to being with. | - None - | ||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | March 11, 2020 The Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Engagement Panel: I would like to commend the Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Engagement Panel (Panel) for its significant public outreach including eight public community meetings and six all-day public workshops. Through these interactions they listened to the public’s concerns and to different perspectives. They became the conduit between the public and various regulatory agencies and PGE. So far, their outreach has generated over 1,000 comments from the public meetings and workshops, online forms, emails and conversations with Panel members. These comments are a direct result of the Panel’s and local community members’ deep commitment to the future of Diablo Lands. This work resulted in the Strategic Vision, Goals and Recommendations as written in the Panel’s “A Strategic Vision”. Anyone listening, or attending this meeting should read the Vision statement at https://diablocanyonpanel.org/ The vision statement is comprehensive and represents the San Luis Obispo County community including our tribal community. It’s a document that provides guidance for the multiple aspects of shutting down a nuclear power plant including what is left behind when decommissioning is complete. One tonight’s agenda is the California Public Utilities Commission Investor-Owned Utility (IOU) First Right of Refusal for Disposition of Real Property within the Ancestral Territories of California Native American Tribes – (CPUC Tribal Land Policy). This policy is compatible with the Panel’s Vision Statement and I encourage everyone to read the CPUC Tribal Land Policy. You’ll see for yourself what it does for California Tribes but also what it doesn’t do. It can be found on the CPUC.gov.ca. It’s a courageous document with the goal of acknowledging past injustices against California Tribes but it’s not a free pass for us, or for any tribe. The CPUC Tribal Land Policy gives us a first chance to discuss purchasing property and if we become purchasers, we’ll be governed by the same standards as other buyers. These standard should include appropriate conservation easements and a variety of managed public accesses and activities. We are indigenous to San Luis Obispo County and region but we’re also your neighbors and your co-workers. While San Luis Obispo County and Region is our ancestral homeland, we know it’s your home too. We’re not the only ones who love this place and we all want to see a good outcome for Diablo Lands. SLO County residents respect the history of our region and many families have lived here for generations, but regardless of how long you’ve lived here, it’s now your home and place you care about too. As a landless tribe, we hope to find a way forward to acquire property at Diablo Lands. We wrote our first letter to Pacific Gas and Electric, on this topic, within a few days of the announcement of the power plants decommissioning and we have been working for a positive outcome ever since. I’ll end by once again encouraging you to read the Panel’s Vision Statement then read the CPUC Tribal Land Policy. Thank you, Mona Olivas Tucker, Chair | yak tityu tityu yak tiłhini – Northern Chumash Tribe San Luis Obispo County and Region | ||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | The majestic coastal property, known as the Diablo Canyon Lands, if open to more public coastal access than is currently available, should, in my opinion, be managed like the current Point Buchon managed access trail program. People should tread upon this area lightly, saving it for future generations as a research site and a preserve for the rich, diverse intertidal biological resources and the abundant coastal bird rookeries in this area. I am in particular concerned about human impact to the intertidal areas. As a docent with State Parks and retired biologist, I understand that encountering tide Tide pools and the ocean's intertidal zones contain some of the most diverse collections of life on our planet and especially so along this coastline—it is imperative that any future plans for access to the Diablo Canyon lands maintain that diversity. . My other concern regarding the management of the Diablo Canyon Lands is the protection of numerous cultural sites, some dating to over 9000 years old, that without a managed access plan would attract collectors who know how to detect these sensitive Native American sites. Cal Poly’s Anthropology department has worked with the Native American community and currently have several study sites along this coastline. Many of these cultural sites are easily accessible along the current Point Buchon trail, but those who may be searching for artifacts are directed by trail attendants to stay on trail. The trail attendants are aware of these cultural site locations and protect them from human disturbance. I urge you to work with organizations like Land Conservancy of SLO, Wildland’s Conservancy group, or UC Natural Reserve system. I also urge the engagement panel to support the preservation of these lands by developing managed access programs Best regards, Sally Krenn | Pt-Buchon-headland-copy.docx | ||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | I urge conservation of Diablo Canyon Lands. The conservation of (in perpetuity) and public access to the Diablo Canyon Lands makes sense on multiple levels. The land is remote, prone to fire damage, and has a single lane in and out. There is no access to existing services and amenities. These lands are truly unique from an ecological perspective - much of coastal California has been forever lost to development. Here, we have a chance to preserve one of the last coastal stretches of natural California for current and future generations. | |||
March 11, 2020 | Decommissioning Funding | Please address how this plan fits within PG&E's ongoing bankruptcy proceedings, and the company's ability to accommodate the great financial liability of decommissioning while facing ongoing disaster-related penalties and mitigation costs. | |||
March 11, 2020 | Lands and Tribal transfer | We need the "tonic of wildness" we can never have enough nature. The Diablo Canyon Lands and the Pecho Coast is where "wildness" still reigns. As the Chumash, who occupied these lands for thousands of years, remind us - all life is a gift. These wild places give us so much, and we are the lucky ones who have seen and felt the wildness this land has to offer. Now is the time to return the favor, these lands need us to find ways that they will not only be there for our children and grandchildren, but will remain wild. Continuing the land stewardship of managed access that has kept this place so special requires foresight, understanding, and creative effort. A collaborative effort with land conservancies/trusts, range trusts, Cal Poly, private companies, and tribal entities that foster understanding and respect for nature, and show care and commitment to the lands future may just keep the Pecho Coast unspoiled for future generations. Conservation may be a goal and high priority for a tribal entity, however to ensure conservation of this special place and that conservation values are protected in perpetuity, conservation easements must be considered for any land transfer to make "darn-sure" that this incredible coastline is protected and sustainable public access is assured. If true, that conservation of the land is a tribal goal, then any tribal entity should have no issue for PG&E to place a caveat that these lands will be protected forever. My current calling is a part time "job" on the stunningly beautiful Pt. Buchon Trail. That "loved" trail is in existence because of prior DCP permits and mitigations. We should do the same for the remaining 12,000 acres by using the tool of decommissioning permits and land mitigations to help conserve the complete Pecho Coast and Diablo Lands - forever! | |||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | I have two comments: 1.) All land transfers away from P.G.E. must include conservation easements. That is the desire of the county residents as evidenced by the passage of the Dream Initiative in 2000 and the near one thousand written comments to the engagement panel. The D.C. Engagement Panel further outlined the will of our Community in its' Strategic Vision Document. The conservation easement will insure that the will of the people is protected. 2.) There is significant precedent for the conservation of D.C. Lands through mitigation. The decommissioning project must include mitigation of the rest of the Diablo Lands. This must include public access to and conservation of these lands as the community deserves and has rallied for in numerous ways over the past twenty years. Thank you. | |||
March 11, 2020 | Impact got the Avila community | The Avila General Plan Update needs to be completed and adopted before approving any new large development | Avila resident | ||
March 11, 2020 | Spent Fuel Storage | Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Those recommendations are still appropriate and I strongly support them. I am particularly concerned that the dry cast storage site be hardened against terrorist attack. The casks should be shielded from ground attack by berms surrounding the pad. More concerning is the casks extreme vulnerability when being moved from the pools to the storage pads. This slow 10 hour trip with only a water jacket for radiation protection is an inviting target. | Former member SLO County Nuclear Waste Management Committe and Former County Fire Chief | ||
March 11, 2020 | Career Opportunities for Local Students | Dear Panel Members, I work at the Plumbers and Pipefitter Union Local 403 in San Luis Obispo as an instructor and supervisor. Our hall helped build Diablo Canyon and through that process many current and past members learned our trade through the apprenticeship program. They took those skills and bettered our community through starting businesses, construction and maintenance. Many of us planned on working at Diablo Canyon for years into the future but, sadly PG&E has decided to decommission. For those who have completed their apprenticeship and become Journeyman it means traveling more to support our families. For those who are in the apprenticeship and those young people in search of high quality blue collar jobs this may limit their opportunities. I meet with high school students, teachers and counselors and many of them are looking high quality blue collar jobs. We do our best to bring in as many apprentices as we can. Our training combines classroom and on the job training. When Diablo Canyon decommissions those job opportunities could be limited or go away completely. One way to make sure there are high quality jobs for students coming out of high school is to support our all of our local apprenticeships by recommending a community workforce agreement that includes all trades. I know that the panel members do not make the final decision but your recommendations can help push things in the right direction. Please consider recommending a community workforce agreement that includes all trades. | |||
March 11, 2020 | the meeting tonight, 3-11-20 | Dear Panel, Coming from a public health perspective, I applaud the decision to close tonight's meeting to the public. Allowing for all comments to be submitted online is a good and wise way to handle the health issue that can potentially affect us all. What I would caution, though, is a last minute maneuver for folks who either were not informed about the change or don't abide by the rules to show up and ask to have their voices heard anyway. We all know the important impact of a speaker in person, for the face to face ability to connect with another's passions and convictions, as opposed to reading them on paper or online. This would negate the democratic process of having all voices heard fairly. This might already be planned for, and I apologize if it is already dealt with, but I earnestly ask that there be paper available for those who do show up, so that they are equally represented with the ones that have been informed and are abiding by the rules. Thank you for all the work you all have been doing and continue to do, Sincerely, Wendy Lucas, MPH | |||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | Please see attached letter. | Concerned Citizens for Avila | 2020-03-11-Letter-to-PGE-DCDEP.pdf | |
March 11, 2020 | Environmental Impacts | Hi Panel, I have led hikes in the local area for more than 50 years and can clearly see the value of connecting Montana de Oro to Wild Cherry Canyon. It would extend the California Coastal Trail and remove the gap in SLO County that currently exists. This would be a major benefit for visitors and locals, creating recreation possibilities and spurring tourism. I ask you to consider placing a conservation easement on any new trails to ensure public access in perpetuity. Thanks for your consideration, | |||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | Keeping Diablo Canyon open is the best way to protect the lands. | |||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | Please take time to make public comment for the Lands at Diablo Canyon and the Tribal Lands Transfer Policy. https://diablocanyonpanel.org/dcdep-public-comments-table-view/entry/1296/?gvid=2131 Diablo Decommissioning Panel Comments in Lue of public attendance. | |||
March 11, 2020 | Lands | Please make this decommissioned land available to the pubic for walk and horseback riding. I also hope it is not offered as a whole property to the tribal Indians for sale.. | |||
March 10, 2020 | Lands | The Northern Chumash Tribal Council Comments on Tribal Land Transfer Policy, which is Before the Decommissioning Engagement Panel For the Transfer of Tribal Lands under the Stewardship of PG&E At Diablo Canyon to Tribal Peoples March 3, 2020 First NCTC has several concerns this policy. It has been brought to our attention that a member of the Decommissioning Engagement Panel has a conflict of interest, Scott Lathrup is not recognized in the Northern Chumash Community as a Tribal Spokesperson, and it is our opinion he has been supplying the Panel with misleading information and unsubstantiated facts. A Tribal Spokesperson must earn the right to be recognized as such, Mr. Lathrup has not ever appeared at any scoping/EIR meetings, appeared before any local agency and/or spoke to preserve the Chumash Culture or Heritage, It is our opinion that Mr. Lathrup has never been seen at any meetings, nor has he stood up for the Northern Chumash ancestors, not once, this does not make a spokesperson, you have to earn it. It is NCTC opinion that Mr. Lathrup should be removed from the Panel for misleading the Panel. Mr. Lathrup does not speak for the other 12 Tribal Government on the California Native American Heritage Commission list for San Luis Obispo County, but, it is Mr. Lathrup’s duty as a community panelist to supply the Panel with accurate information about the indigenous community, and not self-dealing for his group only, and speak truthfully about the entire Northern Chumash Community, which he has not done, and should be removed and replaced. The Northern Chumash Tribal Council (NCTC) is a California Native American Chumash Tribal Government, with tribal headquarters located in Los Osos CA. NCTC was formed under the guidelines of California Senate Bill 18 April 26, 2006, as a State Recognized Tribal Government, by the Native American Heritage Commission, organized and dedicated to preservation of the Northern Chumash Culture, Heritage and Sacred Sites. NCTC is dedicated to meaningful consulting with local governments, agencies, consulting with the development community, and supporting tribal community well-being. NCTC is spearheading with local community NGO the Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary, a one of a kind opportunity for all future generations. NCTC was the first Tribal Government in California to negotiate changes to the General Plan, under SB18 guidelines. NCTC was the first Tribal Government in the United States to guide the County Board of Supervisor on August 9, 2011 to be the first County Government to support and indorse the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples by resolution. NCTC is the first Northern Chumash Tribal Government to place a member on the Cal Poly Presidents Advisory Council. NCTC is the first Tribal Government 2 Members of NCTC have an ancient history with the land of the Pecho Coast, family members have long been a part of that land, and the last Northern Chumash to be born on these lands is a member of NCTC. NCTC is an agriculture entity, not a casino seeking entity, and NCTC would like to secure a land base on the PG&E property, specifically the farm houses on the northern end of the property. NCTC would like to rise of our bees, fruit, and implement our newly patented thrivable vegetable growing systems, a place to bring our elders, and place to have gathering of our community, all the while sharing this beautiful lands with the broader local community. It also would be a place for education and learning of our tribal life ways, a show place our broader local community can see what NCTC is doing today for the future of our children. NCTC has always envisioned the PG&E properties as a gem to be seen by all that want to visit our great wonderful lands; open to the public, trails, horse trails, day visitations, Tribal land base, and wholesome community recreations opportunities. Second, NCTC was not notified by the CPUC, nor were the other 12 San Luis Obispo County Tribal Governments on the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) list of contacts for San Luis Obispo County. This process must have transparency, must not be limited, must not be exclusive, and must include the broader indigenous community and the broader local community of San Luis Obispo County, in all land transfer agreements. NCTC and the community of San Luis Obispo County are friends and neighbors, we work together to make it better for all. In the policy document of the California Public Utilities Commission Investor-Owned Utility Real Property- Land Disposition – First Right of Refusal for Disposition of Real Property Within the Ancestral Territories of California Native American Tribes Document, on page 6 last sentence and page 7 see the following: Comments: The Commission’s Emerging Trends Committee adopted a draft version of this policy in April 2019, and made the draft version available for public comment on the Commission’s website. The Commission received comments from the Pacific Forest and Watershed Lands Stewardship Council, the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake, the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., the Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians, the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation, the Native American Land Conservancy, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Southern California Edison Co., San Diego Gas & Electric Co., and the Manzanita Band of the Kumeyaay Nation. The Commission also conducted several workshops, both in person and via webinar, and received informal comments there. Out of all the over almost 200 Tribes in California the commission only received comments from 7 Tribes, this is inadequate attempt at outreach, it is NCTC opinion that NAHC Tribal list for all 3 Any and all agreement, MOA, MOU letters of intent and contracts based on the above referenced Tribal lands should be void. No agreements should have been made without full disclosure and transparency to all interested parties. Environmental Justice needs to be served. How would the land be transferred? Is it free? Is it a donation? Is there bidding? What is the clear delineation of the terms for Tribal Lands transfer? Meaningful consultation means tribal consultation in advance with the decision maker or with intermediaries with clear authority to present tribal views, this should comprise meetings and a series of communications, providing clear and detailed information about the surplus property to tribal decision makers so that the tribe can adequately assess whether historical, cultural, or spiritual resources are impacted by the disposition. The IOU and CPUC should make every attempt to contact Tribal Governments on the NAHC list at the very least 7 times. Most tribal governments are small, and overburdened with more than 200 notices per month under AB 52, SB 18, NEPA, 106, and other regulations, and these notices usually fall on overburdened hands. An IOU notices must use this understanding, and make sure meaningful contact attempts have been made, before moving forward. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this so very important Policy, the Indigenous Peoples have long been forgotten, it is so inspiring to see this great support for the re-acquiring of our lands, our lands that will help us heal from the dark days. Northern Chumash Tribal Council, Inc. | Northern Chumash Tribal Council | ||
March 10, 2020 | Lands | Violet Sage Walker Dear Diablo Decommissioning Panel Comments in Lue of public attendance.: The distinction between Chumash groups, that may have shared territories, are akin to differences in religious, political, environmentalism ideologies. These differences have created a crevasse as wide as the Grand Canyon and as deep. Please understand for personal family reasons two Northern Chumash Tribes should not be confused. The Northern Chumash Tribal Council, Inc. was formed under the guidelines of California Senate Bill 18 on April 26, 2006, as a state-recognized mutual benefit corporation (EIN 84-1709436) NCTC was the first to register and use the name Northern Chumash in our Non-Profit organization. NCTC is one of several State Recognized California Native American Tribes in Northern San Luis Obispo County and has been reviewing all projects in San Luis Obispo for the past 30 years previously under the San Luis Obispo Chumash Council and under the direction of elders who have since past. Hence, it has come to my attention that the panel members may not be aware of the distinct divide and separation between the two groups. I would never presume to speak for another Tribe or deny another tribal organization its respect and due process afforded to them as individuals. NCTC has been working closely with many of the panel members on various issues for the last few decades. Those who know us, know that we show up, we comment, we participate we are engaged with the community when we KNOW about it. NCTC affirms the willingness to work with the community to have open space, public access to Pecho Coast lands around Diablo canyon. With all due respect please set aside the discussion on the tribal lands until the CPUC can hold meetings and public comments in our community. Please include us in the future direction of the panel. And lastly, I have documented ownership of the lands and oral traditions previous to Spanish occupation of the lands in question dating back to the early 1800’s and we are officially requesting the opportunity to get it back. Sincerely, | Northern Chumash Tribal Council | Northern-Chumash-Motion-for-Party-Status.PDF | avila-sewer.docx |
March 10, 2020 | Lands | I am one of thousands of people in this county who invoke you to conserve and protect this 12,000 acres of | Mothers for Peace | ||
March 10, 2020 | Environmental Impacts | Topic: Adverse Environmental Impacts of DCPP's Planned Closure Please see the attached one-page article excerpt (and the entire article) | Californians for Green Nuclear Power, Inc. | Nuclear-Safety-Shellenberger-P1-03-11-19.pdf | It-Sounds-Crazy-But-Fukushima-Chernobyl-And-Three-Mile-Island-Show-Why-Nuclear-Is-Inherently-Safe-Shellenberger-03-11-19.pdf |
March 10, 2020 | Lands | The Sierra Club, along with the Nature Conservancy, American Land Conservancy, Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County, Wildlife Conservation Board, California State Coastal Conservancy, Department of Parks and Recreation, California Coastal Commission, CALTRANS, State Water Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board have repeatedly affirmed the high conservation value of the Diablo Canyon Lands. In 2016, as a party to the case hearing PG&E’s application for approval of the retirement of Diablo Canyon, the Sierra Club noted that the Joint Application was “silent on the fate of the Diablo Lands, over 12,000 acres surrounding Diablo properly described in the Application as ‘a unique and sensitive biome.’” We stated that “PG&E should be held to past commitments supporting permanent conservation of the Diablo Lands and include its conservation as part of the Application’s community benefits.” In 2018, we pointed out to the PG&E Community Engagement Panel, and reiterate now, that Measure A, the Diablo Resources Advisory Measure, or DREAM Initiative, passed 20 years ago this month with a vote of 75% of the electorate, urged the conservation of the Diablo Lands upon the closure of the plant. The measure was supported by PG&E, the SLO County Board of Supervisors, and numerous public, private, and non-profit entities. Measure A asked, and the voters overwhelmingly answered in the affirmative, “Shall the County Board of Supervisors recognize the Diablo Canyon Lands as an exceptionally precious coastal resource by adopting policies that promote habitat preservation, sustainable agricultural activities, and public use and enjoyment consistent with public safety and property rights once the lands are no longer needed as an emergency buffer for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant after its remaining operating life?” This panel has stated: “It is the intent of the DCDEP to promote the conservation of Diablo Canyon Lands consistent with recent public input at workshops and meetings and the passing of the DREAM Initiative.” “The request for land ownership by the local Native American community should be acknowledged and considered as a valid claim for historical reasons, while bearing in mind the overwhelming public testimony that the Diablo Canyon Lands be conserved and available to the public for managed use, with protection by conservation easement or other such means that would allow limited development consistent with local zoning and the preservation of environmental and cultural resources in perpetuity.” In issuing a Tribal Land Transfer policy without notifying or seeking input from the public or state resource agencies, the Public Utilities Commission has potentially compromised these goals, as well as appeared to endorse a narrow and exclusive version of this policy which seeks to predetermine which tribal entities shall be accorded a right of first refusal and which ones shall not. The Sierra Club believes that all Native tribal groups with an interest in and history with the Diablo Canyon Lands are entitled to party status. Further, in order to realize the goals affirmed by the DCDEP, it is essential that a conservation easement be attached to the Diablo Canyon Lands and that this easement run with the land in perpetuity, held by a non-profit conservation organization or agency, and include terms to restrict future development and provide appropriate public access to ensure the sustainable use of the land. The easement should be drafted to incorporate the components of this panel’s vision statement, goals, and recommendations pertaining to land transfer and use, including: • The land should be preserved in perpetuity for the public and future generations, in acknowledgement of its significant resource values We urge the DCDEP to relay the necessity for a conservation easement to the CPUC prior to the Commission’s drafting of formal implementation guidelines for the Tribal Land Transfer policy. Finally, pursuant to your panel’s discussion of the permits needed by PG&E to decommission the plant and whether those permit conditions can ensure conservation of and public access to the Diablo Canyon Lands, we point out that the nexus between a requirement for a conservation easement and any agreement pursuant either to the continued operation or closure of the plant is well established. The need for such an easement or a permit condition requiring an easement as mitigation for 30 years of damage from the plant's once-through cooling system has been affirmed by both the Regional Water Board and the California Coastal Commission, which have independently stated that this should be done to mitigate the impacts of once-through cooling on marine habitat and wildlife. | Sierra Club | ||
March 10, 2020 | Lands | March 9, 2020 Pacific Gas & Electric Subject: Engagement Panel Meeting March 11, 2020 Dear PG&E Staff and Members of the Engagement Panel: The City and residents of San Luis Obispo have a long-standing interest in the decommissioning of the Diablo Canyon Power Plan (DCPP) and the critical issues surrounding it. Indeed, as expressed in early communications with PG&E, the City Counci has adopted the following policies relating to the decommissioning. - Ensure the continued safe operation of the DCCP, so as to protect the health and safety of the community; The Engagement Panel’s March 11, 2020 meeting is focused on the Diablo Canyon Lands, and the City of San Luis Obispo and its residents are also very interested in the disposition of these lands. There is a long history of the Central Coast’s prioritizing the conservation of these lands. It is reflected in the overwhelming passage (by nearly 75%) by SLO County residents of the Dream Initiative in 2000 – which called for the conservation of and public access to the Diablo Canyon Lands once the plant closes. Also, the work of the Engagement Panel– including now four public meetings, almost 1000 written comments, and the Panel’s Strategic Vision document – reflects the will of this community in conserving the Diablo Canyon Lands. The conservation of and public access to the Diablo Canyon Lands makes sense on multiple levels. The land is remote, prone to fire danger, and has a single path in and out. There is no access to existing services and amenities. The development proposed here has been very high-end estate homes in the multiple million-dollar range that no working-class person could ever afford. Development of the Diablo Canyon Lands is exactly the opposite of thoughtful planning and sustainable development. Moreover, as public park, the land can generate tourism dollars to support the local economy. And clearly – as demonstrated by the wonderful but already over-subscribed Pismo Preserve -- we have a high demand for outdoor recreational areas along the Central Coast. Protection of the Diablo Canyon Lands not only gives people recreational access to thousands of acres, it also enables a 20 plus mile coastal trail stretching from Avila Beach to Montana de Oro. And, importantly, the Diablo Canyon Lands are truly unique from an ecological perspective – much of Coastal California has been forever lost to run-away, ill-conceived development. Here we have a chance to preserve one of the last, coastal stretches of natural California for ourselves and future generations. As to how conservation can be achieved, we believe that it should occur through the DCPP decommissioning process. Our residents are being asked to carry the burden of that process, including noise, traffic, restricted coastal access, and more. We’ll also likely be burdened indefinitely with managing the nuclear waste on site. For this, we should expect PG&E to mitigate these impacts and conserve all of the Diablo Canyon Lands. We ask PG&E and County of San Luis Obispo to fulfill the policies enumerated above for the safe and efficient decommissioning of DCPP, as well as ensure the conservation of and public access to the Diablo Canyon Lands This is what the community has asked for, and it is what the community deserves. Sincerely, Heidi Harmon, Mayor | Letter-Mayor-Harmon-to-PGE.pdf | ||
March 10, 2020 | Lands | This property should be transitioned to public use with multiple use, non motorized (Including NO electric bicycles) trails, with parking large enough for horse trailers. | BCHA/WCRMHC/RN | ||
March 10, 2020 | San Luis Obispo | KCBX is advertising an opening on the panel and states to go to the website for an application. I can't find an application anywhere. Where is it? Thank you. Ellen Sheffer | |||
March 9, 2020 | Lands | As I will be unable to attend the proposed meeting on March 11, I wish to make my wishes known as a local resident of San Luis Obispo. I urge you all to insist and support the repurposing of these lands for public use in a manner that is environmentally sustainable and that respects the historic and sacred traditions of Native Americans. I would further suggest that a major effort be undertaken to plant a great many trees. We all know that in abundance of trees can dramatically mitigate the disastrous effects of the climate change crisis. Thank you for your consideration of my comments. | |||
March 9, 2020 | Environmental Impacts | Dear Panel- Decommissioning Permits and Land Mitigation- I do understand there will be a myriad of permits needed by PG&E to decommission the plant, and whether those permit conditions can ensure conservation of and public access to the Diablo Canyon Lands. As you know previous Diablo power plant permits have resulted in the protection of 1200 acres of the Diablo Canyon Lands at Point San Luis, as well as the Pecho Coast and Buchon public trails, which were functioning simultaneously while the power plant was operational. My view, like others have expressed, is that the conservation of and sustainable public access to all of the Diablo Canyon Lands is the only truly appropriate mitigation for the burden this community has to bear for the massive decommissioning process, including such impacts as traffic, noise, and restricted coastal access, as well as the on-site management of highly radioactive waste. Additionally, I would request that PGE be required to have a fully funded escrow account in place to pay for any potential accidents that might happen with the prolonged cask storage, and that PGE be required to develop, publish, and hold annual disaster planning workshops with the State of California OEM, County of SLO Emergency Services, Local Hospital and healthcare response teams to develop a well-planned, community response team to immediately respond to any and all potential accidents. We need to be mindful of the tragic and horrific nuclear accidents that have transpired in Japan, Chernobyl, 3 mile island, And others, and be more prepared, more intelligent, and more responsible to prevent such an accident from occurring, and most importantly immediately responsive to prevent any loss of human life or fragile coastal environment. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please consider my concerns and add them to the list of items for consideration. | |||
March 9, 2020 | Lands | See attached document submitted by the Northern Chumash Tribal Council | Northern Chumash Tribal Council | PGE-Tribal-Lands-Comments-022720.pdf | |
March 9, 2020 | Lands | To Whom It May Concern, My name is Michael Bear-Walking Khus-zarate, son of Pilulaw Khus of the Northern Chumash Bear Clan (this corresponds roughly to the San Luis Obispo county). I am requesting that on behalf of my clan and the Chumash people that I represent, that I be included in the process for Party Status in Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s (PG&E) Application A18-12-008. I grew up on the Central Coast where my family has always resided and still do so. I now live in the Fresno area and work as an educator at Clovis Unified School District. However, I maintain close ties with my family and tribal members on the central coast. The Northern Chumash Bear Clan (NCBC) under the leadership of Pilulaw Khus has long been active in the San Luis Obispo area, conducting ceremony, participating in local events, visiting local schools and protecting Chumash cultural resources. She is the author of Earth Wisdom: A California Chumash Woman (University of Arizona Press). We have made a special effort to educate the public about Chumash culture by participating in various local events such as Earth Day and by going into classrooms to share songs and stories with the children. The message reflects our cultural values of respect for human rights, world peace and protection of the environment while reminding the non-Indian public of the continued relevance of the Chumash people. We have also been heavily involved in protecting Chumash cultural resources by consulting with city, county, state and federal agencies on projects throughout our traditional territory. Protecting Chumash cultural resources has been a priority, particularly in spiritually significant sites. One of these places is the Carrizo Plain National Monument in northeastern San Luis Obispo county. I have served on the Monument’s Native American Advisory Council since 1998. This advisory group has been open and inclusive of all interested Native groups, Chumash and Salinan alike. The CPNM Management Plan now includes a robust preservation and mitigation plan for cultural resources thanks to the efforts of the Advisory Council. We have also led Summer Solstice ceremony there every year since 1988 when the site became open to the public. Another significant site, the so-called “Whales Cave” at Avila Beach near Diablo Canyon suffered from an oil spill and clean-up operation from 1997-98. The US Coast Guard as the lead agency in that operation coordinated with the NCBC to safeguard Chumash cultural resources from further damage during the months long clean-up operation. NCBC approached Pacific Gas & Electric Company in 1987 for access to the nuclear plant area to conduct the Winter Solstice ceremony and to pray for the remains of over a dozen Chumash people whose burials had been disturbed during the construction of that nuclear plant. We were subject to a rigorous security background check before we were granted access for the overnight vigil and ceremony. Subsequently, the ceremony was successfully conducted every December for four years without incident and with the full support and cooperation of PG&E. Again, our ceremony was open to all Native groups and individuals who wished to participate. It is not unfair to say, that NCBC and other Native tribal groups have usually been supported in our efforts by the non-Indian public. Numerous city, county and federal officials have met with us and consulted with us over these many years. Broad, county-wide support by the mainstream public for inclusion of Native interests in projects that impact cultural resources is indicated in the record whenever the public has been asked their opinion. However there are some in the native community itself who have taken the misguided position of “exclusivity”, claiming that only their group should have standing in the Party Status process. These people claim singular and exclusive interest and legitimacy throughout the county and in particular at Diablo Canyon. This is wrong on at least two counts. First, the historical and genealogical record does not support this unprecedented, radically narrow interpretation of the background and composition of the Chumash community. Historians and most anthropologists have rejected this interpretation. They note that it is largely based upon incomplete and fragmentary records from the Mission era. Spanish missionaries did not ever complete what we would call a census count of the native population. Their record keeping was focused upon the standard church recordings of births, marriages and deaths that occurred among their native neophytes. These records simply did not include everybody. Nor is there any way to scientifically verify those records, as no other European institutions bothered to record the native populations, such as the Spanish military nor the Mexican authorities that followed. Later during the early American settlement period of the late nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries, there were a few scholars who attempted to investigate the California native peoples, notably Alfred Kroeber and JP Harrington. Again, there were no real census counts available. They were working with minimal information. The 1997 Final Reports and Recommendations to the Congress of the United States, compiled by the congressionally appointed Advisory Council on California Indian Policy (ACCIP, of which I belonged as a representative for the un-acknowledged tribes) provides a summary of the historical record of neglect by the federal government (California state government policy was initially one of genocide with death squads and removal of all of the indigenous populations). Demographers estimate that at least 95% of the California indigenous population was wiped out by the turn of the last century. Thus, it should not be surprising to anybody that many California Indians would look upon government officials and academics with suspicion if not bitter contempt as they struggled to survive in a hostile environment that had once been their secure homelands. So, when such men as linguist J.P. Harrington solicited California native people for their cooperation there were many who refused or kept silent. This sentiment remains in many native communities today. Even when Harrington secured “informants” to aid his linguistic research, his intention was not to record a comprehensive history or ethnology of the Chumash. The second reason that “exclusive” groups are wrong, is because they have not learned their own tribal values and culture. Most of these people have come only lately into the circle of self-identified Chumash people, and they have had little or no instruction from traditional Elders. They depend upon non-Indian academics for their status and identity rather than the larger California Indian community. Here is what they are blind to: the communal nature of being Chumash and California Indian. This bedrock value accounts for the resiliency of all the California Indians who survived. History shows that the decimated and dispersed Chumash and California Indians survived by joining together in mutual support at the local and regional levels. When for instance, the people were sick or pregnant and could not afford mainstream physicians they turned to native midwives and “Indian doctors” and it didn’t matter what clan or tribal group their ancestors derived from. My own great-great grandfather, Pacifico Gallego-Archuleta was known to the Venturno-Chumash of Ventura because he was one of these “Indian doctors” who traveled to the south coast area frequently in his day. The importance of such pan-tribal*, pan-Indian networks cannot be overstated and they have carried forward even to the present day. These social/cultural networks have helped enable the revival of many California tribal groups. One of the most well-known Elders and spiritual leaders who traveled to the central coast from southern California during the so-called American Indian re-awakening of the 1960-70’s at the invitation of the Chumash community, was Therman McCormick, Sr. (Lusenio). In response to a question about who an Indian is today, he dryly replied: “now, we’re all mongrels”. His message was that what matters most is our respect for one another as the descendants of the few survivors of the indigenous California people, and not the purity of our individual biological lineage. Therman McCormick believed in the inclusive values that were rooted in his traditional spirituality as he had been taught. Indeed, the ACCIP recommendation to Congress in its Final Report was an expansive one: a singular definition for “California Indian”, that would acknowledge both the original culture of all the tribes and the diverse composition of the Native peoples of California that is a reality today. Finally, I want to say that the Northern Chumash Tribal Council led by Fred Collins has my endorsement. Their position of inclusion for all interested Native groups is in keeping with the spirit of community, cooperation and mutual support that the NCTC has upheld for decades throughout the San Luis Obispo area. I join with the Council to continue to protect and preserve Diablo Canyon by having it restored to the whole Chumash community. Sincerely, Former Member, Congressional Advisory Council on California Indian Policy * Note: there is no scientific or government consensus on the definition of “tribe”. In California the term is used loosely to describe family-clan groups and multiple family groups. | Northern Chumash Bear Clan, SLO | ||
February 10, 2020 | Spent Fuel Storage | Very few of the local residents know what will happen in the long run with the 250,000 half life of the spent fuel rods. Can you give us an explanation in the Tribune? | |||
February 10, 2020 | Lands | This comment received from a member of the public in response to my email about the Panel Agenda for March 11, 2020: "Let’s presume, for the sake of argument, that once upon a time there was a band of Homo sapiens that occupied (I doubt any concept of “ownership” was involved) the lands around Diablo Canyon that did not displace other humans to be there, that had some kind of tribal identity associated with “Chumash,” and that this original group occupied those lands continuously and exclusively until they were displaced and destroyed by the Spaniards, more or less beginning in the 1500s, but really underway by the 1700s. The Mexicans declared independence from Spain and took over in the 1820s, shortly thereafter to be displaced by the Americans. Since 1850 various individuals or entities have “owned” that land (acquired by various means) until finally PG&E acquired it – by hook or by crook. Now, 500 years later, we somehow are charged with addressing Spanish (and subsequent) injustices to benefit a group of people who claim their ancestors were there first? | Email response to March 11, 2020 Panel Agenda | ||
February 10, 2020 | Lands | I think it is a great idea to give a good portion of the land back to the Northern Chumash Tribe. The name Diablo (Devil) was given by the Spanish when they tried to bring part of the tribe out but were caught in an earthquake. | |||
February 9, 2020 | Lands | I would like to know who generated the "Diablo Canyon Land Ownership" map that depicts parcels and respective ownership, color-coded et al. I assume it was a GIS specialist and would like to know this person, as well as ideally how to contact them. Thanks. | San Luis Bay Estates, CCCMB, Trails Alliance, San Luis Distance Club, | ||
February 5, 2020 | Economic Impacts | As you move forward with the decommissioning of Diablo, please consider creating a project labor agreement to keep as many of the jobs local for this project. Our community will be losing good jobs. it’s imperative for the vitality of SLO County to keep our local community members employed with head of household jobs as long as we can. Please help keep our community and their families thriving. | |||
February 2, 2020 | Economic Impacts | I would like to ask you to please set up an All Trades Agreement for the decommissioning of Diablo Canyon. It would benefit all of the trades in our area. Thank you. | |||
January 30, 2020 | Economic Impacts | As an apprenticed in the pipe trades it would be great to see a full building trades agreement or community workforce agreement with all trades. | |||
January 30, 2020 | Economic Impacts | As an apprentice in the building pipe trades it would be great to see a full building trades agreement. | Local 403 | ||
January 30, 2020 | Economic Impacts | Getting the decommissioning of Diablo Canyon under a Full Building Trades agreement would be financially beneficial to our community. | |||
January 30, 2020 | Economic Impacts | id like to see the decommissioning done under a full trade agreement with all trades so the laborers don't soak up all the work | |||
January 30, 2020 | Economic Impacts | I worked out at diablo canyon during maintenance projects and i would like to see a community workforce agreement with all trades represented . | |||
January 30, 2020 | Economic Impacts | As trade union member I would like to have a secured job. I am hoping you give our pipe fitters union the opportunity to participate in the work of decommissioning. | Local 403 | ||
January 30, 2020 | Economic Impacts | What I would like to see is a community workforce agreement with all trades represented for the decommissioning of diablo canyon. | |||
January 30, 2020 | Economic Impacts | I think it would be a good idea to get a community workforce agreement that represents all of the trades for decommissioning | Local 403 | ||
Date | Decommissioning Topic | Comment / Suggestion: | Group Affiliation, if any (Optional) | Uploaded File 1 | Uploaded File 2 |