September 19, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Posted on the FOWCC FB Page:
Greetings, FB Friends: The Diablo Canyon Community Engagement Panel has been meeting these last few months to discuss and encourage community input regarding the closure and decommissioning of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant. The next public hearing is set for next Wednesday night (September 26, 2018) at 6:30 PM at the SLO County Government Center (1055 Monterey Street, SLO). The topic for this meeting is the future uses of the facilities and land that immediately surround the power plant, including the marina area and intake/discharge coves. (By contrast, last month’s meeting focused on the future uses of the 12,000 acres of buffer lands that surround the plant, including Wild Cherry Canyon.)
Do you have a vision for the future uses of this area (also known as “Parcel P”)? What is your opinion about the future uses for the marina and adjacent coves?
Thus far, the panel has heard from a variety of entities on these questions, including Cal Poly, SLO EVC, Clean Tech Incubator, Pacific Wildlife Care, Port San Luis Harbor District, Cal Energy Development, Perryman Technologies, and ya tityu tityu yak tilhini. These entities have suggested various conceptual reuses for the existing Diablo facilities and infrastructure. In addition, the Harbor District has suggested possible boat storage and slips at the marina. There has also been public comment about the breakwaters, most suggesting that they be kept in place rather than removed.
What do YOU think?
Your input is welcome and encouraged, and we hope you’ll attend the hearing and express yourself. And if you have a vision but not the time, please submit your comments using the link below.
Hope to see you September 26th!
| Friends of Wild Cherry Canyon | google.com | | |
September 19, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | I received the following comment by a member of the community:
"For GOD's sake, please do not ruin the marina and cove area of the Diablo canyon lands. Protect this area for marine wild life. As for breakwater, do whatever is the best outcome for the protection of marine animals and sea birds."
| | | | |
September 19, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Thank you for affording me an opportunity to toss my two-cents in. Moire than anything, I would like to see the repurposing of Facilities to undergo a transformation into a showcase for sustainable, safe, renewable solar, wind, and the 'harvesting' of natural ocean wave action energy production.
I would also like to see all nuclear waste storage facilities made a lot more safe and secure to guard against terrorism, earthquakes, and other natural disasters.
| Los Osos resident since 2000 | | | |
September 18, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Please distribute the letter attached, written to Salud Carbajal, to the panel as a possible alternative use for the plant. It is somewhat out of the box but has potentially great benefits to the veterans who have given so much.Larry W. Bittner
2460 Vista de Avila, PO 2434
Avila Beach, CA 93424
805-595-2797 larrybitt@charter.net
September 18, 2018 Time Sensitive
Honorable Salud Carbajal, Congressman 24th District
212 Cannon HOB
Washington, DC 20515
1411 Marsh St., Suite 205
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Re: Reuse of Diablo Nuclear Power Facilities for Veteran Services
Dear Congressman Carbajal
With less than one ten percent of our population serving in today’s all-volunteer military, it is incumbent on those of us benefiting from their bravery and patriotism to care for those who return with injuries that they will have to endure for life. For those not killed in action, many of these injuries alter their lives totally. When there is an opportunity to improve the resources available to these patriots, we should all support those opportunities.
In 2024 the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, located in San Luis Obispo County. will close. When the nuclear power generating equipment is removed, the complex of buildings and other facilities will remain for reuse. Currently Pacific Gas and Electric is considering potential uses and recipients to donate everything remaining after the removal of the nuclear waste. Importantly the location of the facilities is located on pristine coastal property located on the California Central Coast about half way between Los Angeles and San Francisco making it ideal for those veterans who must travel far for services. Therefore, this pristine property and its facilities would be ideal for a Veteran Clinic/Hospital along with long-term care for the most deserving veterans.
Since you participated in a forum regarding the closing and reuse, you understand many of the concerns of the community regarding the limited access to the property. The property is only assessible through the narrow two-lane road through Avila Beach. The community has great concern the potential users will generate additional traffic beyond its road capacity. This would exclude all the residential and commercial development projects proposed. However veteran service facilities would have minimal traffic impact on the community.
PG&E has created an Engagement Panel to review potential uses. I believe the panel and the community would enthusiastically support a proposal from the Veterans Administration to utilize this wonderful property to better serve our Veteran’s.
Page 2.
While the above is a long-term project, PG&E is currently searching for an organization for their Community Center located one block off Hwy 101 in San Luis Obispo, CA. The current VA Clinic is in a crowded area of San Luis Obispo with limited parking. The PG&E Community Center is a better location, has a larger building and better parking. Importantly, the VA pays rent at the current facility while this property could be attained by donation.
During your time in the Marine Corps, like myself, we understand the risk our military troops endure for little compensation. As a US Congressman, you are positioned to spearhead this project to provide the quality services our veterans deserve. Considering the long war on terror ahead the need to take care of our people will only increase.
I am willing to personally assist you or your staff to help our veteran brothers and sisters. Let me know how I can help.
Semper Fi,
Larry Bittner
C: Robert Wilkie, Secretary Veteran Administration
Ann Brown, Los Angeles Healthcare System Director
| | | | |
September 15, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/15/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| Cal Energy Development Company | | | |
September 15, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/15/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| Perryman Technologies | | | |
September 15, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/15/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| yak tityu tityu yak tilhini - Northern Chumash Tribe | | | |
September 15, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Public Comment at 9/15/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| | | | |
September 15, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/15/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| Port San Luis Harbor District | | | |
September 14, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/14/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| Clean Tech Incubator | | | |
September 14, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/14/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| SLO EVC | | | |
September 14, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/14/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| Pacific Wildlife Care | | | |
September 14, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/14/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| State Lands Commission | | | |
September 14, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | Presentation at 9/14/2018 Facility Repurposing Workshop. Please see workshop video.
| Cal Poly | | | |
September 12, 2018 | Lands | I am writing concerning the lands surrounding the Diablo Canyon Power Plant. I attended the August 29th meeting in San Luis Obispo. I heard land conservation with access, but without over use, as the major interests in repurposing the lands. I spoke to suggest that the University of California Natural Reserve System be considered as a land manager, as the mission of the Natural Reserve System is to contribute to the understanding and wise stewardship of the Earth and its natural systems by supporting university-level teaching, research, and public service at protected natural areas throughout California. The UCNRS already manages 39 reserves and over 150,000 acres throughout California. I want to invite the members of your committee to contact me and visit the Ken Norris Rancho Marino Reserve that I manage here in Cambria, to get a glimpse of how a UC Natural Reserve works. Like the Diablo Canyon lands, although on a much smaller scale, this reserve has 2 miles of rocky coastline, coastal grasslands (with a grazing program) and a forest (Monterey pine). I have had the good fortune to tour the Diablo Canyon Lands with rancher Bob Blanchard biologist Sally Kren, and truly appreciate the value and beauty of Diablo Canyon’s relatively undisturbed lands and how their management strategies have helped conserve these lands. I look forward to hearing from you and hopefully showing the Ken Norris Rancho Marino Reserve.
| Univeristy of California Natural Reserve System | | | |
September 10, 2018 | Lands | My name is Rob Rutherford. I am a Professor Emeritus from Cal Poly, where I was a faculty member in the Animal Sciences Department from 1974 – 2013. During that time, my duties were to teach the sheep management classes, to manage the school’s flocks of sheep, and to advise hundreds of students. I have also served as the President of the California Wool Growers Association (established 1861), the oldest livestock organization in the United States. Over the many years, my thinking as to how we must manage the grazing lands of the state has changed significantly. As an academic, I have had the privilege of observing how the scientific community thinks and acts. As the leader of a statewide livestock organization, I have had the privilege of seeing how the actual on-the-ground management by progressive thinkers can make a huge difference on the earth. I have seen conventional management which resulted in a decline of land health. I have seen progressive management which has resulted in increasing land health, increasing carbon sequestration, increasing wildlife habitat and health, improving water quality, and the list goes on. I have observed both ends of this spectrum right here in San Luis Obispo.
Those who will be charged with the management of the lands currently owned by PG&E around the site of the Diablo Canyon Energy Plant have an amazing opportunity to continue a legacy of progressive management. I am specifically thinking of those lands which would be termed “rangelands” given that their plant types have evolved over the eons with grazing animals, both small rodents up to and including large ungulates. These extremely complex relationships, which we know very little about, have resulted in the vast array of flora and fauna that are adapted to this unique coastal region. During the past 100 years, many of these acres were farmed with tillage equipment familiar to us all. This was a major step in altering the historic composition of soil microbiology, which then lead to a change in the vegetation types. For the past several decades, the lands north of the plant, an area called the Pecho Ranch, have been managed utilizing large and small ungulates in an effort to return the land to a more healthy and biologically active condition. This has only happened because PG&E had the foresight to create a land stewardship committee which worked with the grazing leasee in order to make sure that proper management was in place. This management created increasing health and abundance of soil microbiota, soil macrobiota, wildlife including birds and mammals, and also plants from grasses, forbs, and shrubs. The land stewardship committee rigorously monitored the health of the land and with the cooperation of the leasee modified the grazing intensity and patterns. Because of this, the land also yielded products from the livestock which bolstered the local economy. All the while, the public has been able to access and witness these realities over the past several years. There have been many wonderful changes on the Pecho because of this management approach. It can be claimed that this management truly addressed the triple bottom line, being that it addressed the ecological, social, and economic needs of the area. It is a success story that needs to be shared. At this time, a similar success story is being written on the Carriso Plain at the Topaz Solar project. An independent third party has monitored the changes in the biology created by the use of sheep grazing within the arrays. The results are stunning in just 4 years. These successes have only happened because of the management.
It would be fully understood that when faced with the decision as to what should happen on rangelands, the logical approach would be to contact range scientists, probably at a University with a solid public reputation. In fact, California is blessed with a relatively small cadre of certified Range Scientists who do their work very well. They are experts at creating and overseeing research, exploring ideas and concepts. It is particularly frustrating doing this on a rangeland because it is impossible to sort out all the “background noise” created by those very complex biological relationships. Nevertheless, information continues be recorded and published. The rangelands need scientists. However, to be a scientist is different from being a manager. We are blessed with very talented human health researchers who would not likely be very good personal health managers (physicians). The health of the land requires excellent managers who are willing and able to use some of the information produced by scientists. If the health of the landscape is a goal, it needs to be managed by a manager – not a scientist. Obviously, the land offers a wonderful place for field research. I would strongly urge that the consideration of the management of this living, productive part of the coast be conducted in such a way as to continue the progress of the past several decades.
I was heartened to know of the interest of the Wildlands Conservancy in this particular property. I am very impressed with their dedication to enhance a living landscape. All of their properties are utilizing very progressive livestock owners in order to create the landscape desired by most of us. The leadership there have also encouraged the integration of the faculty and students of various institutions of higher learning, in order to make the properties living laboratories. I am quite confident that under the guidance of the Wildlands conservancy, public and private educational institutions would be intricately involved in learning and research. This is an approach that ownership by the State of California will never create, in my opinion. I have visited quite a few properties owned by the State and none compare with the biological richness of the Pecho, which is entirely due to the unique, progressive management.
The decisions which will determine the future of these lands will be difficult and complicated. I appreciate that the input of the community is being welcomed and considered diligently. I would welcome any conversations that would further “flush out” the concepts presented above.
Rob Rutherford
robtrutherford@gmail.com
4757 Bridgecreek Road
San Luis Obispo
| Whole Options LLC | | | |
September 7, 2018 | Lands | I was a participant on the August 22nd tour. I would like to see:
1) Public access to the coastal shorelines
2) Resort facility with upscale hotels, restaurants, possible conference center.
3) Marina facilities
4) Public park and beaches
5) Campground
6) Safe ingress and egress road facilities to alleviate any Avila Beach increased traffic..
7) Small amount of high end ocean view custom housing developments. No high density.
8) Possible consideration of a 17 mile drive approach like Pebble Beach.
| None | | | |
September 7, 2018 | Lands | Dear Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Engagement Panel,
I am a 17-year San Luis Obispo County resident, two-time graduate of Cal Poly SLO in Forestry and Natural Resources Management (BS and MS), and a volunteer docent and board member with the nonprofit organization Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo County (ECOSLO). I would like to take this opportunity to express, as a private citizen, my thoughts on the disposition of PGE’s lands during the nuclear power plant decommissioning process.
The August 29, 2018 meeting on this topic in the San Luis Obispo County Government Center chambers was excellent. The huge amount of support for conservation of these lands was very encouraging. As a longtime student of ecology as well as a hiker, occasional mountain biker, and all-around conservationist, I feel strongly that most of the lands in question should be set aside for habitat preservation and given some sort of protected legal status, with moderate non-motorized recreational access provided. I support the creation of a moderately intensive trail system, mostly using existing ranch roads, with a limited amount of primitive backpack/bike camping allowed. I also support the continuation of existing agricultural uses unless serious problems with this were to be identified – I’m not currently aware of any.
On the coast, construction of the California Coastal Trail should be a high priority. A visitor center/Chumash cultural center near either Avila Beach or Pt. Buchon (i.e., someplace where there is already existing public vehicle access) would be very appropriate. A short, paved ADA-compliant “discovery trail” of the type seen in many parks and nature preserves should be provided in this location.
Inland, I believe Wild Cherry Canyon and some of the higher peaks in the area (e.g., Saddle Peak or other nearby high points) should have trail access for hikers and mountain bikers. An access point from See Canyon/Prefumo Canyon Road should be provided.
A point regarding trail use: Due to the ever-increasing problem of conflicts between fast-moving mountain bikers and slow-moving hikers and equestrians on so-called “multi-use” trails - conflicts that have forced me to stop taking my handicapped son hiking on several local trails because of the danger - I believe it will be very important that there be substantial separation of trails for bikers vs. hikers/equestrians. This separation could be physical (different trails) or temporal (hikers and bikers share the same trails, but on alternating days). This is an opportunity that was inexplicably lost at the Pismo Preserve, as bikers were given access to 98 percent of the existing and new trails, and hiker-only trails are almost nonexistent. Let’s not make that mistake again.
I would also like to see some sort of continuation of the paved Bob Jones bike trail heading north from Avila Beach. Road biking is a healthy and rewarding activity for both individuals and families, but unfortunately there are not many places to do it safely in this county. A stretch of paved bike trail along the Diablo-area coast would be a huge draw.
Finally, I do not support new public road access connecting Avila Beach and Montana de Oro. I feel that this would inevitably open up the area to all the trappings of civilization: hotels, wine bars, luxury subdivisions, outlet malls… glider ports. I believe we already have enough of those things in this county. The affordable housing crisis in our county is very real, but I do not believe that the lands in question should be considered for housing development, as there are many more appropriate alternatives throughout in the county.
In summary, we have an astounding, unique opportunity to create something very special for future generations in the Irish Hills. While some in our community will complain about the lack of new business opportunities that would accompany conservation of the land, recreation generates its own revenue stream, which can be significant. Add to this an attention-getting legal designation, such as the National Seashore idea that was proposed, and the tourism draw from no-frills recreation (eco-tourism) could be very substantial indeed. If we are open-minded enough and brave enough, anything is possible.
Thanks to each of you for your service on the engagement panel.
Sincerely,
Christopher C. Hamma
630 Lancaster Drive
Arroyo Grande, CA.
| | | | |
September 6, 2018 | Lands | Sixty years ago, the National Park Service made the following recommendation with regards to the lands surrounding Diablo Canyon: "This large, unspoiled area possesses excellent seashore values and should be acquired for public recreation and conservation of its natural resources." I share that sentiment and believe that the land that is left after PG&E has despoiled a large portion of it should be left as open space with access by the public for hiking. The marina should be restored to some semblance of aesthetics and opened for recreational access.
| | | | |
September 5, 2018 | Lands | Thank you for educating the public what is the scope of "repurposing effort" through tours. This area is such a treasure to all Californians. I'd like to suggest to make the existing buildings as a facility for public conference/event center and lodging for the attendees as well as the public who want to appreciate the natural beauty of California coast, the education on natural history in the area, such as marine life and the flora and fauna; as well as the history of the Chumash, Japanese and ranching. I think the state park is the good candidate to manage the future vision. Asilomar Conference center is a good model
I support part of the canyon to be used for sustainable ranching to encourage the growth of the natural ecosystem.
| none | | | |
September 4, 2018 | Lands | I would like a trail to hike, bike, and ride horses
| Coast Mounted Assistance Horse Patrol MDO | | | |
August 31, 2018 | Lands | Montana de Oro now receives intense use by many more users. Additional land is needed for park use such as trails and minimum development for public use. Gov. Schwarzenegger failed in his job to provide for the continuation of the California Coast Trail through Wild Cherry Canyon. However the use of the marine terrace, where the plant is now located, would be a more practical location for the trail and would provide much needed recreational opportunities. The use of the property for the Wild Cherry Canyon Ultra, marathons and mountain bike races is just one example of the use that can be made along with portions of the land devoted to natural preservation of the area. Such use would require minimum development on the property.
The area lacks natural resources for intense development and the topography of much of the land would require major devastation of more natural areas that California has lost much of through its history.
All those who are involved in the decision of the final disposition of the land should be required to take tours through the back country as well as the plant site. After volunteering for the Ultra twice I felt a deep affection and attachment to this small part of our State.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
| Central Coast Concerned Mountain Bikers, Retired County Land Use Planner | | | |
August 31, 2018 | Repurposing of Facilities | My wife and I request the non-radioactive facilities on the site be repurposed as follows:
1) DCPP Fire Dept and Flex building >> deeded to CDF. Funding to come from CDF.
2) The Admin Bldg and other administrative offices given to Cal Poly. Funding to come from the University System. It should be remembered that the site has excellent internet connections.
3) The Intake Cove to be jointly used by USCG, Cal Poly, and Marine Mammal Rescue. Funding to come from those sources.
4) The Main Warehouse and Cold Machine Shop deeded to the USCG. The parking lot next to the Main Warehouse could be used as USCG helicopter landing pad and the main warehouse used as indoor hanger and living quarters for USCG.
5) The DCPP Desal Unit and the Sewage Treatment Plant along with associated piping would need to be retained for the above facility use. Funding to come from all facility owners.Incoming electricity would also need to be maintained for the facilities.
6) The I&C shop, medical facility, Turbine Building (all or parts), Maintenance Training Bldg, and vehicle garage (up on the hill) be given to State Parks. Funding to come from State Parks.
7) The Simulator Building given to the Chumash Tribe for cultural education and whatever they want to use it for. Funding to come from the State.
8) The site parking lots could become camping sites and limit the number of public allowed on the property at any one time. This would generate funds for the site via State Parks.
9) The plateau and animal coral at the 3.5 mile marker be used by Equestrian groups and could also have some camping spots at that location.
10) The DCPP shooting range deeded to the SLO Sheriffs Dept for their use and other local law enforcement use.
11) The Access Office (in the Flex Building) could be used as the State Parks greeting area and camp ground control office.
12) The MET towers should be given to NOAA. Funding to come from NOAA.
13) The only facilities that actually need to be torn down for decommissioning are the Containment Structures, Aux Bldg, and 115' Radwaste Processing facilities in the back yard Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA). The rest of the site is not radioactive (except for ISFSI) nor contaminated.
14) The rest of the 14,000 acres should be maintained for conservation and habitat. Very few locations have access to the intertidal zones due to the cliffs.
15) Some parts of the Turbine Building could be turned into industrial space (software companies, MINDBODY, professional offices, etc). Money generated from that rent could go back into the site maintenance. It should be remembered that the site has excellent internet connections.
| County resident | | | |
August 31, 2018 | Lands | I received these comments about the August 29 Lands meeting:
“One of the more intelligent and coherent public hearings I've attended.”
“It was a great meeting.”
| | | | |
August 30, 2018 | Lands | I was not able to make the public meeting about Diablo but feel it is important for the property to become open space and protected from any private development of the land. PG & E has been a valuable community partner and steward of this pristine land and I would hope it remains that way long after the plant is decommissioned. Thank you!
| local resident | | | |
August 30, 2018 | Lands | I appreciate the opportunity to share my thoughts on the Diablo lands. I attended the workshop last night (Aug 29th) and was pleased to hear the overwhelming support for conservation of this precious bit of undeveloped coastline.
I do share concerns about too much human access. In my mind this is one of the last places that the plants and animals that are native to the area have been allowed to exist with little disturbance.
I was interested to hear that there might be sources of funding to allow the lands to remain open space. In my opinion, an organization like the Wildlands Conservancy, which apparently already has funds, would be a great addition to our county. With their emphasis on youth education, their policy on free access, and their interest in conservation and wildlife corridors, they would provide opportunities that are currently not in our county. I assume that something could be put in the documents to make sure that the lands are protected forever. State parks might also have money available but state park facilities are often short of funding for maintenance and don't usually have the education outreach that Wildlands does. I have been on the Wind Wolves property, toured around by Dan York. He is willing to try some innovative management strategies that I doubt State Parks would try.
I suppose it might be premature to share my thoughts about who should take on the management of these lands but I wanted my thoughts out there. I was surprised that no one from the building industry was represented last night. I do have concerns that they will still be a powerful force. Just remember the comments of Sam Blakeslee - this is a rare moment to do something that echos through history.
Please write your report expressing the overwhelming support for conservation and urge PG&E to transfer the lands only to an entity who will be focused on conservation.
| | | | |
August 30, 2018 | Lands | Please consider multiuse trails including equestrian use!
| Ride Nipomo Equestrian Alliance | | | |
August 30, 2018 | Lands | The decommissioning of the power plant is the opportunity to extend the California Coastal Trail through to Montana Oro, a vital and very scenic link. A network of non-motorized connector trails should also be linked to maximize the economic and cultural benefits to the surrounding community.
| Santa Barbara County Trails Council | | | |
August 30, 2018 | Lands | Thursday, August 30, 2018
DEAR DIABLO DE-COMMISSIONING PANEL-
I am writing to you now because I was not able to stay and share my 2.5 minutes last night at the public forum outreach.
First of all thank you to each of you, the panel- for your willingness, your dedication, time, and effort to serve on the panel and serve us all, the general public- as it is very important to work towards consensus and solutions about how the Diablo lands and facilities will transition from its current state to a safe, environmentally sound, and sustainable future, without the nuclear generating facility. Kudos and appreciation to PG & E & the leadership of dedicated biologists line Sally Krenn who worked so diligently as good stewards of the land while under their watch.
Clearly, the land, and that stretch of coastline is a treasure now, and will be again, despite the imposition of the imminent danger that is there as long as the spent fuel rods are there. Yes, please, let’s not forget that- the proverbial “elephant in the room”. We the people that live in this area the past 40 years have become so accustomed & complacent about the warning sirens we hear annually. If you hear those sirens and live within those areas where the sirens blare- your lives, and the lives of all living creatures in that sphere, hang in the balance. The potential for devastating damage to all life forms in the vicinity of Diablo looms large, so long as there is the infrastructure of the working plant, the in-progress decommissioning and deconstruction, and the storage of spent fuel rods and cooling pools, even if the footprint of those areas is reduced down to just “ a few football fields”.
I want you to be mindful & respective of the lessons in history we have seen in our lifetime and recall or re-examine the unfortunate but very real horrors of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and certainly Fujimori Japan. Perhaps you, the panel, should interview the various people of San Onofre, to hear how their decommissioning & disassembly has transpired. In an instant, without much warning or help, those nuclear disaster areas were changed & ruined forever.
SILENT VOICE-
I wanted to speak to you last nigh as a representative of a voice you did not hear from, nor will you hear from. Fresh from my trip to Peru, where the Ancestors of the Incas shared with me their belief & respect for “patcha Mama”.aka Mother Earth. They have 3 symbols that they use to represent Patcha mama; 1) the snake, which represents all creatures living in & below the ground,2) the Puma, the representation of all animals that live upon the ground, and 3) the Condor, the representative of all living things above ground, and in spirit form. Patcha Mama, aka Mother earth, then represents all living creatures that share the earth as its inhabitants.
. We all share this space and share its responsibility to be sensitive to our collective needs. I feel strongly we must not solely look at our human- derived wish lists and desires, but we must develop a land use designation, layout, and management that serves all living creatures- not just our human inherent desire to acquire & control more resources, but rather a plan that provides for and enriched the lives of all living creatures, from the soil organisms & insects to the birds and animals and plants that need connectivity and habitat and seclusion & protection, rather than “affordable housing”, or “networks of trails” or “flight paths” that are important to have as human outlets- but not necessarily here on the land that historically has belonged to the animals and creatures and Native Americans prior to Diablo construction.
I encourage each of you to go upto Wild Cherry Canyon, or some other secluded canyon or parcel up in the adjacent Diablo lands. Just sit, quietly, for about 10-20 minutes, maybe a half hour. Just listen. Look. Feel the life & beauty that surrounds you. It abounds. That is the voice that I want you to hear and be motivated by. That is the life force, the energy, the beauty that I want you to be mindful of. This space, in its entirety, and all the living creatures- from little ants and millipedes to soaring Red Tail hawks… want you to hear them. They want you, as panelists, to recognize that their future and survival is dependent on us humans being generous, kind, and respectful of their needs. We must make tremendous effort to hear “their voice” and give weight and significant relevance to nature and it’s needs. Their voice, though Silent, should be given attention, respect, and creedence.
For upon examination, who is it, really, who has sacrificed more than the animals and living creatures, and spirit world that live in the areas directly impacted by Diablo ?
Not PG&E- who generated incredible income and provided jobs, and much needed energy for our consumptive masses.
Not us, who was “denied access” for safety and security reasons- and to the benefit of the lands adjacent to Diablo.
It was the sacrifices and accommodations made by:
The animals and creatures who were killed by Diablo traffic or construction.
The fish and sea life who were, and continue to be affected by Diablo impacts of intake and outflow.
The plants and trees and soil organisms that were trampled or removed or destroyed by Diablo.
Please, I ask you again, as a representative of the “silent voice”- all Patcha Mama and Mother Earth’s creatures… make decisions that benefit the nature, ecology, and flora and fauna of the area- not just look at this “wonderful opportunity” to conserve & gain access for needy human beings.
I was greatly encouraged and moved by the overwhelming desire for “conservation” in its various forms. I was also encouraged to hear a movement to act soon, as soon as lands become “releasable” and ready for “preservation”, and Nick Franco, Adam Hill, and Land Trusts have already gathered resources and energy to make conservation moves before closure of the plant.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please do what I asked you- and go, alone, and sit and hear the voices of Patcha Mama I asked you to hear & consider. I guarantee you this… it will be a peaceful and enriching ½ hour.
Respectfully yours,
Bruce Berlin
CaliFlora Resources
Arroyo Grande
| | | | |
August 30, 2018 | Lands | I support the conservation of Diablo Lands, which includes Wild Cherry Canyon and encourage the protection of the Central Coast. I envision such limited use as trails for hiking, non-motorized biking and possibly equestrian. Designed and managed public access comparable to the Pismo Preserve.
| Concerned Citizens for Avila | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Debby Lyon
16 MS. LYON: My name is Debbie Lyon. I live in
17 See Canyon. I'm an equestrian. I am pretty passionate
18 about horses and wilderness. And in all that's being said
19 about conservation, there is kind of an overtone of the
20 balance between protecting the land and the species out
21 there and the habitat and all of that and the need for
22 public access. And I'm also in the mental health field,
23 and I feel that access to wilderness, particularly for
24 children and teenagers, is essential to their mental
25 health.
0076
1 And I believe that a well-designed and planned
2 trail system is the best way to balance public access and
3 protection of the land because when you have impacts of
4 public access, it's usually because there is development
5 or there are people just everywhere. But when you have a
6 well-designed trail system that plans where people will
7 go, people stay on the trails and they have minimal impact
8 on the land and on the wildlife, at the same time as being
9 able to be out there in the wildness and experience it.
10 Thank you.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Red Cordes
11 MR. CORDES: Good evening. My name is Red
12 Cordes. I'm a Oceano native and I do sustainable, edible
13 landscaping. My overall concern is I would like to see,
14 overall, the land under conservation easement,
15 specifically Wild Cherry Canyon preserved in its entirety,
16 as well as public access trails, ecotourism type stuff,
17 what everybody else said.
18 I would also like to see the main PG&E facility
19 surrounding the plant -- I can see it conformed
20 potentially to be used for renewable energy, keeping some
21 of the transmission lines and using solar panel energy,
22 some wind energy, as well as creating a satellite campus
23 for Cal Poly and Cuesta to do biology classes, marine
24 biology studies, also clean energy, like studies to learn
25 about clean energy because this is our future. And I
0077
1 would also like to see some limited development for the
2 Northern Chumash tribe as well. And also some restoration
3 of some of the coastal lands, ecological restoration. I
4 would also love to see some stable forestry on some of the
5 lands as well. Thank you very much.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Jeff Herten
6 MR. HERTEN: My name is Jeff Herten. I am a
7 physician. I have lived in See Canyon for the last
8 40 years. I am married to Debby Lyon, you just heard
9 from. We've spent thousands of hours of our time building
10 and maintaining the trails to Montana de Oro for both
11 running and riding. I'm a trail advocate. Bob Jones was
12 a patient of mine and a friend, very good friend. And I
13 am here for him tonight because I know what he would say,
14 and he would say that we have this incredible, rare
15 opportunity to do something beyond anything we will ever
16 be able to imagine, and I think we can do this.
17 Debbie and I sit on the board of the Western
18 States Trail Foundation, which maintains a 100-mile trail
19 from Squaw Valley to Auburn. It's a historic trail. And
20 about 10 years ago, a timber lease -- our trail crossed a
21 timber lease, and although we have prescriptive rights,
22 they were going to sell this timber lease. We were faced
23 with the possibility that we couldn't put on our hundred
24 mile ride and the trail would be lost. Through concerted
25 effort with conservation groups, we were able to raise $13
0078
1 million and buy that timber lease and turn it over to the
2 American Wildlife Conservancy, and it will be preserved
3 the forever, for us to enjoy that trail and for our
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
4 children. And I hope that we can do the same with this
5 beautiful, beautiful piece of coastline. Thank you.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Delaney Wells
Comment card read at meeting.
12 MS. HOSN: Delaney Wells had asked that we read
13 that PG&E should sell each zone or section individually at
14 the time each section is ready to speed up the process and
15 make the land more accessible for other parties who wish
16 to use it.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Martin Wright
Comment card submitted at meeting.
I'd like to see as much of the structures as possible not be torn down be reused. Examples and suggestions for reuse of structures:
1 - DCPP fire dept. Given to DCF and financed by CDF (state)
2 - Intake cove maint shop bldg, afea 10 simulator bldg given to Coast Guard and financed by USCG
3 - Area 10 + intake cove utilized by Marine Mammal Rescue Assoc. financed by Marine Mannal Rescue Funds
4 - Shooting range given to Sherriff's Dept and funded by SLO Co Sherriff's
5 - Main warehouse and cold machine shop and admin bldgs given to Cal Poly or University system for new college funded by state university and tuition
6 - Desal unit be maintained and used by South County governments and residents and support above
7 - Sewage treatment plant and piping maintained to support above
8 - North of Diablo Creek utilized for Chumash education center
9 -Turbine bldg used ofr businesses. The site has excellent internet connections.
10 - The I+C shop and vehicle maintenance garage utilized by State Parks, financed by state parks
11 - MET towers utilized by NOAA
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Vita Miller
6 MS. MILLER: Hi. My name is Vita Miller, and I
7 live in Los Osos and I'm a long-term resident of this
8 county, and I am the only person that is going to say I
9 was an activist protesting the siting of the Diablo Canyon
10 Nuclear Power Plant, and my family and I marched several
11 times. And having said all that, I do want to thank PG&E
12 for having been good stewards of the land these years.
13 My main concern in the beginning was always
14 about the storage of nuclear waste, and as you can see,
15 that remains a continued concern within our county. I am
16 here to advocate for the conservation and protection of
17 these precious lands, and I think they need to be kept in
18 the hands of people who share that goal. So whoever takes
19 over the overseeing of it, I hope that they have the same
20 goal. I would like to see Native Americans involved in
21 that. I would like to see some kind of a learning center,
22 perhaps, artifacts and restoration of Native American
23 lands and, perhaps, students could be brought there to
24 learn more about the Native American history in our
25 county.
0064
1 I also want to advocate for the protection of
2 the Wild Cherry Canyon preservation and best land use
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
3 should be agreed upon. I do advocate for public access,
4 but I really want to say that I agree with what
5 Mr. Knight, Randy Knight, said about habitat corridors.
6 And I think that's a really important thing that needs to
7 be considered here. In fact, all living organisms need to
8 be considered, not just human organisms. We need to think
9 of plant species and we need to think of nonhuman
10 organisms.
11 That's pretty much what I had to say. I am an
12 advocate for keeping this in perpetuity in its natural
13 state as much as possible. Thank you very much.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | One thing I did not address to the panel in regards to multi-use trails is this- much of the labor will be free. There are a number of new trails being constructed throughout the county using volunteer labor. And SLO POST is able to contribute funds toward the construction as well. Multi-use trails work very well in our county because the various user groups respect each other. Our bike riders are cognizant of how to conduct themselves around horses, for example. They ask if they need to step off the trail. They yield the right of way appropriately. They recognize that horses are prey animals and that their reaction is flight.
I'm not convinced I want to encounter a parasail, glider, or drone on a trail with my horse. Admittedly,I experienced a hang glider once. Our horses were a bit startled by it and did react. But it didn't cause a problem, particularly because we were on the beach and the horses did not feel confined. AND they were experienced trail horses who had encountered strange things on the trails, like seeing tripods bobbing through the brush. And they got that way through experience. I had one horse who was thoroughly used to motor dirt bikers trying to scare her. The first time she saw a mountain bike on a trail, she threw me. And that sucker was far, far away. I had to go home and ride a bike around her. It isn't easy to find a parasail or glider to buzz your horse so they get used to it. I'd advise keeping the flying things away from multi-use trails. I've had friends who have encountered drones being flown straight into their horses faces on the trails. Some people are plain idiots who enjoy trying to see a show.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Charlotte Gorton
6 MS. GORTON: Good evening. My name is Charlotte
7 Gorton, and I live in San Luis Obispo. My career was in
8 parks and recreation, and I served on the Cal Poly
9 Advisory Committee on Recreation, Parks and Tourism for
10 more than the last 10 years.
11 I feel this is a golden opportunity to preserve
12 the pristine lands of Wild Cherry Canyon and PG&E property
13 surrounding the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant for
14 generations to come. The positive benefits to our
15 community will be a long-lasting legacy we can be proud
16 of. It would be wonderful if the majority of the land can
17 become park land with some conservation, as we've been
18 speaking about tonight, with public access to trails,
19 campgrounds and other recreational amenities. The
20 buildings and facilities of the power plant could be
21 donated to Cal Poly University to be used as a learning
22 center with labs and classrooms, including a marine
23 center. That would be after they have become safe,
24 obviously.
25 I would love to also see the desalination
0066
1 facility retained to provide additional community water
2 resources. This beautiful coastline would greatly enhance
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
3 our existing park inventory, particularly joining Montana
4 De Oro and the Irish Hills, those large open space areas.
5 If developers are allowed to take it over just to build
6 expensive homes and lay down lots of concrete, this golden
7 opportunity will be lost forever. Thank you.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Supervisor Adam Hill
9 MR. HILL: Good evening, I am Adam Hill. I'm
10 from the Board of Supervisors, 3rd District, which is
11 where the plant resides. And I just want to start out my
12 remarks by thanking, once again, the panel for doing a lot
13 of work for the community. I know you've sat through a
14 lot of meetings, and you have more to go. And your work
15 and your recommendations are critical to this process, so
16 I really do thank you from our perspective.
17 And I am here to speak to the decisions and the
18 opportunities that lie ahead for our community and for our
19 state. We have a unique chance here to shape major policy
20 and investment choices in a collaborative way that can
21 yield significant conservation and economic benefits. The
22 prospect ahead of us will afford us several different ways
23 to strengthen regional collaboration as we work together
24 to transform our challenges into productive possibilities.
25 As you know, the Board of Supervisors has been
0039
1 keenly focused on Diablo-related issues, and we will
2 continue to intervene in the State CPUC process to ensure
3 the county, as a whole, is represented. We have
4 identified this process as a high-level strategic planning
5 item and we have actively intervened in the state CPUC
6 process to be certain that the local voice is heard. We
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
7 have also worked hard on SB1090 to ensure the unintended
8 economic consequences of state energy policy are mitigated
9 in our local towns and cities.
10 It's imperative that we think very strategically
11 and maximize the opportunity this long-planning horizon
12 gives us. To that end, while I remain concerned about how
13 the state will replace the energy degenerated at Diablo
14 Canyon power plant -- meaning it would be a very bad bet
15 if greenhouse gasses increase because fossil fuel has to
16 be utilized until renewables can replace some of the
17 baseload power -- however, I am excited about the renewed
18 opportunity that the transition can provide us if we don't
19 squander it. That is the key here.
20 Specifically, we should be thinking about the
21 lands for conservation in a sequential manner, in phases.
22 If portions of the lands are not affected or encumbered by
23 the Utility direct ownership or the decommissioning
24 project, I suggest to the panel that we look to be able to
25 pursue conservation on those lands as soon as possible.
0040
1 More specifically, given the changing dynamics, including
2 that a State Park bond was recently approved by voters, I
3 think we should remove Wild Cherry Canyon conservation
4 effort tonight. There is no reason the lands owned by an
5 affiliate company to PG&E that don't impact the actual
6 decommissioning project should be tied up with and delayed
7 by a decade or more to wait and see what happens.
8 As I think, as Ms. O'Malley recommended, we
9 should seek a disposition particularly of the Wild Cherry
10 Canyon lands. We should want to pounce on the alignment
11 of the State Park bond funding, the new focus on this
12 area. We can make this happen. And no one at your
13 workshops, according to your own summaries tonight, or
14 anyone has contacted my office over the last probably few
15 years, has advocated for development, but rather for some
16 form of conservation. And I have been working quietly but
17 diligently over the course of a few years with a very
18 small group of local leaders that can make the community's
19 dream of owning Wild Cherry Canyon a reality.
20 I hope you will forcefully recommend that the
21 Wild Cherry Canyon property be detached from the
22 decommissioning planning now and that we be given the
23 opportunity to own this beautiful land for public use.
24 Thus, I also encourage the panel and PG&E to be flexible.
25 If a partner or partners are brought in to stretch limited
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
0041
1 public powers for conservation acquisition with the
2 public-private partnership, then that opportunity should
3 be explored.
4 Again, we have waited a long time. And I feel
5 confident that we have a way to make HomeFed and PG&E
6 financially whole so the public can own this precious
7 asset forever. It's pretty simple from my perspective.
8 We have a great opportunity here. We shouldn't squander
9 it or quibble over subtleties. Let's preserve this
10 property and start the process now. And I have people in
11 place who know how to make such a deal happen.
12 That leads me to concepts I have heard about for
13 repurposing and reuse, which I know the panel will take up
14 next month. I think it's important to be bold. We can
15 have many things that people have been recommending to
16 you, from a waterfront marina, to a place where renewable
17 power, ecological, agricultural, recreational, economic
18 and education activities can flourish together, so we can
19 make that happen.
20 The County's partnership with Cal Poly has never
21 been stronger. The County's partnership with our cities
22 is also at a high point. Our tourism sector is fantastic
23 and growing. Another pride and joy of my district, our
24 airport, is booming. All signs are good that interests
25 can be aligned.
0042
1 And also, let's think about, as you move forward
2 into that next month, a resilient water strategy for the
3 region that includes looking at the desalination
4 facilities at the plant. The future uses on site will
5 need water and a partnership with the County, one we had
6 planned for and will, again, make sense. In fact, the
7 future of the de-sal plant continues to be the most
8 asked-about subject by the constituents. Perhaps no other
9 matter could be of more importance to our communities'
10 future water security.
11 Finally, I want to reiterate the County's role
12 is to be a regulator and intervener watchdog and a
13 catalyst for the projects that could happen here, and we
14 want to get started now. It is going to be decades to do
15 some of these other things. It will be hundreds of small
16 decisions that will crescendo into a very big set of plans
17 that will benefit our community and state for centuries to
18 come.
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
19 So I hope again, emphasis on being able to
20 detach the Wild Cherry Canyon property from the rest of
21 the other decommissioning properties that may be used in
22 that, and let us have a chance to make a project happen.
23 I feel confident that it can. And I want to thank you
24 again for your service and for your thoughtful
25 deliberations.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Teah Anders
8 MS. ANDERS: Hi. My name is Teah Anders, and I
9 am owner of Gentle Touch Pet Training in Arroyo Grande,
10 and I am here on behalf of the dogs. I have heard of
11 wonderful things for multiuse trails and camping, from
12 mountain bikes, hiking, equestrian, all of that, and I
13 think it is all fabulous. No one has mentioned a dog once
14 that I know of, and I would like to be here on behalf of
15 San Luis Obispo County and our dogs.
16 I've personally trained over 9,000 dogs in this
17 county. There are many, many families that have dogs, and
18 there really are not that many places where we can hike
19 with our dogs in this county. And conservation, I'm all
20 about. I have worked in the environmental field for a
21 large utility long before I ever did dog training, which
22 I've been doing for 20 years, but I can tell you that
23 there are many, many families, they love to recreate with
24 their dogs. And so I am simply here on behalf of -- if
25 some land is put aside for public use for multipurpose, I
0067
1 would love to see those also be dog friendly, in addition
2 to everything else. Thank you very much.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Nick Franco
1 MR. FRANCO: Nick Franco. I'm the current
2 director of County Parks. I used to be the district
3 superintendent for California State Parks, so I am very
4 involved in those properties and I am very personally
5 invested. I am sorry I missed your workshop. I had to
6 choose between that and my daughter's wedding, so I made
7 the right choice.
8 So there is few areas of California coast that
9 have the degree of wilderness that this area has. It's a
10 critical area, and it's really an opportunity that can't
11 be missed. And I think you've heard that over and over
12 again, but I just want to state that up front.
13 So I was fortunate to be able to work with many
14 partners, many who are in this room, on the Phase 1
15 acquisition of about 2000 acres that was an addition in
16 the Irish Hills to Montana de Oro. And I say "Phase 1"
17 because this is Phase 2. And when Phase 1 was presented,
18 Phase 2 was identified with Wild Cherry Canyon being a
19 bird preserve and other lands throughout there. So it's
20 on the radar. It was out there. And these things need to
21 follow through and you need to complete the Phase 2 and
22 let the entire Irish Hills conservation agreement. We
23 can't let it fall through like it did last time.
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
24 What I would recommend is don't get caught up in
25 a specific outcome, that it needs to go State Parks, it
0044
1 needs to go to a private developer with conservation
2 easement or whatever that is. Focus on the goals, focus
3 on what you are hearing, which is conservation and view
4 shed and open space values, some trail alignment for the
5 California Coastal trails, some way to connect the Montana
6 De Oro with Avila, some way to connect See Canyon with
7 Avila, some way to make sure that we have those trail
8 linkages, some way to conserve critical wildlife habitat
9 and the cultural resources out there. Those are really
10 the core values and there is many ways to accomplish that
11 through the many different partners that are out there.
12 And then look at those long-term opportunities, connecting
13 with the Bob Jones pathway, additional parking so that we
14 can do the Avila to Harbor Pier Trail and bikeway.
15 There's opportunities for private investment and
16 concessions and other opportunities out there.
17 In terms of financing, there is a lot of
18 partners. You've heard from lots of them. There is State
19 Parks. There is us, County Parks. There is Port San
20 Luis, the Land Conservancy, the private landowners,
21 Cal Poly, lots of nonprofits. And when I was with State
22 Parks, I did put together a budget for operating this. I
23 did put a budget for developing it. We would have to
24 escalate that for the time since 2008, but it's out there.
25 Those documents exist. At the time, there was a 2000 park
0045
1 bond and there was 13 million allocated from that park
2 bond. I think that's been reallocated, but there's Prop
3 68 that's out there now, so there is funding available. I
4 think it can be financed and you need to do that.
5 MR. ANDERS: I just want to remind the panel and
6 the public that the panel will not answer or address any
7 questions during the presentations; however, there will be
8 an opportunity after the presentations for the panel to
9 discuss and make observations about what they heard.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Sam Blakeslee
9 MR. BLAKESLEE: Greetings. My name is Sam
10 Blakeslee. I appreciate all the time and effort you have
11 invested in allowing the public to engage you because you
12 are the public engagement panel. And you have heard
13 testimony, I think, from a broad swath of representatives
14 from this community covering virtually every interest you
15 could possibly imagine, and they have said things more
16 eloquently and more forcefully than I ever could. So
17 rather than try to restate some of the arguments you have
18 already heard, what I wanted to do was maybe bring a
19 slightly different perspective.
20 And it was that we have these very rare moments
21 in each of our lives where we can do something that will
22 echo through history. It doesn't happen very often. Some
23 of us never get that opportunity, if you get two or three
24 opportunities. This is without a doubt one of those
25 opportunities where the right decision made here will have
0068
1 consequences and impacts that will not last five years,
2 ten years, thirty years, but generations in perpetuity.
3 I have been a participant in many hearings and
4 committee involvement that tries to determine what will
5 happen. The doors are thrown open, the public steps up
6 and they speak for hours and hours and hours, three
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
7 minutes at a time. And what happens to all that
8 testimony, nine times out of ten, it is dropped into a
9 report, it disappears, and there is no action taken on it.
10 I bring that up because we are speaking to you
11 as our representatives because only you can speak on our
12 behalf. Now, can you adjudicate the final solution of
13 this? No, you can't. Your recommendations will go to
14 Pacific Gas and Electric. They have obligations and
15 duties to their shareholders and to the rate payers of
16 California. They will make arguments that will go to an
17 administrative law judge as to what they believe should
18 happen with regard to these known assets. An
19 administrative law judge will hear testimony from forces
20 all across the state of California who will argue for
21 every possible outcome, other than the ones that you've
22 heard here today. And ultimately, the Public Utilities
23 Commission will make a decision, and all the voices that
24 were heard here will disappear. And ultimately, that
25 Public Utilities Commission will make their decision. And
0069
1 just as they ignored the committee impact mitigation
2 program that we all fought for, they could do that again.
3 So I bring this up because you have one moment
4 to paint with bright colors -- red, blues, purples,
5 greens, not shades of gray. If you nuance your
6 recommendation with 15 shades of gray of what could have,
7 would have, should have, you will lose that opportunity to
8 have this lifelong impact. And that is your moment to
9 have that impact by speaking for us because we cannot.
10 So I would just ask that as we reach the
11 conclusion of public comment and this discussion comes
12 back to this panel, to think about what can you say and do
13 that will have a lasting impact on this process, which by
14 definition will attenuate every comment you make
15 progressively until even the loudest shout will be a mere
16 whisper in front of the PUC.
17 So I just importune you and beg you to use this
18 moment to speak clearly for the public that you have
19 heard. I'll recite the three recommendations we made 10
20 days ago at your hearing which you graciously invited us
21 to participate in. And those three recommendations are:
22 One, urge PG&E to not convey fee title to Wild Cherry
23 Canyon to any entity that has a purpose other than a
24 conservation outcome; two, advocate for the conservation
25 of the entirety of the Diablo Canyon lands and oppose
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
0070
1 development efforts that are not consistent with the
2 conservation outcome allowing only those activities that
3 are necessary for consistent decommissioning of the
4 facility; and three, because we do need to raise some tens
5 of million of dollars, advocate for the establishment of a
6 blue ribbon panel of conservationists and community
7 stakeholders to immediately begin that process so we can
8 bring a proposal forward that has a chance of succeeding,
9 just as we brought proposals forward in the past, with
10 real money attached to it.
11 I ask that on behalf of the community. And I
12 thank you so much for your public service.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Dan York
0 MR. YORK: My name is Dan York, and I'm vice
11 president of the Wildlands Conservancy. And I was
12 privileged to be able to have the time to be able to
13 attend both of your workshops last week, and I got a crash
14 course in the history and in the proposed future uses of
15 the decommissioned Diablo Canyon lands.
16 I would like to start tonight especially
17 thanking the members of the panel for their time and their
18 dedication and their commitment. I would like to thank
19 PG&E for their stewardship on the land and the amazing
20 amount of care and resources that you put into preserving
21 that exquisite stretch of coast. Sally Krenn, thank you,
22 tremendous amount of energy and focus put into looking at
23 the biological, cultural and resources on the property.
24 And I had a privilege of going with Tom on a short tour of
25 the property. Magnificent.
0046
1 The Wildlands Conservancy owns and operates
2 147,000 acres of nature preserves throughout the state of
3 California, 15 preserves stretching from Humboldt County
4 down to San Diego. The largest preserve is the windmills
5 preserve, 93,000 acres in Southern Kern County, that's 20
6 miles of downgrade from the Los Padres National Forest.
7 It has severed rights and a lot of oil production on the
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
8 property. It has grazing operations, which we have used
9 to focus on resource priority. It has outdoor education
10 for kids and major restoration with several different
11 state and federal agencies.
12 I just wanted to let the panel know and to let
13 the people of San Luis Obispo County know that we are
14 standing by and want to see a conservation outcome for all
15 of these lands that PG&E and the county and the state and
16 the PUC deem as possible. Whether it's in phases, as the
17 supervisor suggested, or in one piece, we stand by and are
18 ready to help.
19 And I guess my last thanks would go to the
20 citizens of San Luis Obispo County who voted
21 overwhelmingly, three out of four, with the Dream
22 Initiative to see a conservation outcome of this land.
23 Thank you.
| Wildlands Conservaney | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Doug Tait
13 MR. TAIT: Good evening. My name is Doug Tait,
14 and I too have a connection to this land. I think a
15 unique perspective, for I have worked for five years on
16 the Point Buchon trail in the trail management of that
17 land for Central Coast Trail Management. I am speaking on
18 my behalf tonight.
19 The word that comes to mind when I think of this
20 land is wildness. Thoreau wrote, "We need the tonic of
21 wildness. We can never have enough nature." That was
22 from his 1854 book, On Walden Pond, and I'm convinced
23 Thoreau's words are more important now than ever. We all
24 need places to go outside to sit quietly, perched on a
25 rocky outcropping above the blue Pacific and stare into
0071
1 its depths. Our senses become sharpened so that we are
2 one with where we are and we can hear the life around us.
3 Sounds erupt all about -- the low puffy blow of the gray
4 whale passing by, the shrill of the Peregrine falcon as it
5 speeds overhead, and through the waves crashing on the
6 jagged rocks, the distinct loud whistling weeps of the
7 black oyster catcher as it searches for mussels. Little
8 by little, more of this environment creeps into our
9 awareness. We begin to understand wildness.
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
10 This special lens for wildness, I believe, still
11 reigns as the Chumash, who occupied these lands for
12 thousands of years, remind us all life is a gift. These
13 wild places give us so much. We are the lucky ones who
14 have seen and felt the wildness this place has to offer.
15 Now is the time to return the favor. These lands need us
16 to find ways that will not only be there for our children
17 and grandchildren, but will remain wild. The decisions
18 made on this land are critical to keep wildness in its
19 place.
20 We should consider the land's highest value, the
21 value it possesses in its own right for what it is. I
22 believe the land's highest value is that it offers people
23 from all walks of life opportunities to enjoy nature for
24 renewal, discovery and learning; however, opening it to
25 the masses would be its downfall. We have loved too many
0072
1 places to death. In California, the wilderness and
2 spectacular beauty of its coastline and coastal bluffs is
3 a rarity, and that has been relatively untouched by
4 humans. PG&E has recognized that access must be managed
5 to protect and preserve the resources and character of
6 this land. Continuing with the likes of PG&E's land
7 stewardship program of managed public access has kept this
8 place so special and may just keep the Pacho Coast
9 unspoiled for future generations, a place where wildness
10 still reigns. Thank you.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Randy Knight
24 MR. KNIGHT: Good evening panel members. My
25 name is Randy Knight. I'm a retired physics professor
0047
1 from Cal Poly, and for many years I was the director of
2 The Minor in Environmental Studies program at Cal Poly.
3 I'll be the first to say that decades ago when
4 the decision was made to site the Diablo Canyon reactors
5 where they are near Point Buchon rather than the Guadalupe
6 Dunes, probably land and habitat conservation was not
7 foremost in people's minds. But today, PG&E finds itself
8 the owner of some of the most intact and wonderful habitat
9 in the state of California. Not only is the ecology
10 intact, but the PG&E lands are essential to the
11 connectivity of habitat along the Central Coast. These
12 lands are immediately adjacent to State Park lands. They
13 are immediately adjacent to lands that are protected by
14 the Land Conservancy. Altogether, these add up to about
15 25,000 acres of lands in the Irish Hills.
16 The connections aren't perfect because of the
17 highways, but we do know that large animals migrate from
18 the Irish Hills up to the Los Padres National Forest in
19 the north, and down south as far as the Dunes.
20 Maintaining this large scale connectivity for migration is
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
21 imperative for the survival of species, especially in the
22 face of climate change, which species can be seen to
23 migrate to areas where they haven't traditionally been
24 found. I'm sure I don't need to remind you that it's far
25 cheaper and easier to make sure species don't become
0048
1 endangered rather than to have to deal with the
2 consequences of a listing of an endangered species. We
3 know from decades of biological research that preserving
4 large and connected habitats is the most important and key
5 thing we can do to keep species healthy.
6 So yes, the Diablo Canyon lands certainly have
7 value potential to real estate. You can put a dollar
8 figure on that. It is not as easy to put a dollar figure
9 on the value of habitat. But I feel I can assert that in
10 the big picture, the value of open space and habitat and
11 connectivity far surpasses the value of possible real
12 estate development. And yes, there are financial
13 implications to how to make this happen. I don't have an
14 answer to that, but where there is a will, there is a way.
15 So I urge you to do the right thing and
16 recommend these lands, all of them, receive permanent
17 protection as open space. Yes, open space with some
18 public access, but primarily open space to protect this
19 valuable and irreplaceable habitat. Thank you.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Sylvia Alcon
11 MS. ALCON: Good evening. My name is Sylvia
12 Alcon. I'm a long-time resident of Avila Beach. I sure
13 appreciate you coming and listening to all of us.
14 Sometimes it feels as though we are not heard, but I feel
15 as though you are hearing us.
16 Last month I visited friends in Marin County.
17 Their family home is in Inverness, located on Tomales Bay.
18 It's amazing to look across that bay or to drive to Drakes
19 Bay, the lighthouse, places I went to as a child, and to
20 find that they look today very much as they did those many
21 years ago. This is thanks to the passage of Point Reyes
22 National Seashore Act that in 1962 protected some
23 71,000 acres from development. Certainly involved working
24 with the large dairy ranchers and many people whose
25 economic interest would be affected.
0073
1 And back in 1959, a Pacific Coast Recreational
2 Survey of the Diablo Canyon area, before the nuclear power
3 plant was built there, found data and I take a quote from
4 that survey, recently referenced in the New Times article
5 by Andrew Christie, quote, "This large unspoiled area
6 possesses excellent seashore values and should be acquired
7 for public recreation and conservation of its natural
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
8 resources." It's not too late for us. We can create a
9 national seashore here which would be maintained by the
10 National Park Service and be a place for generations to
11 use and to enjoy. Thank you.
| | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Richard Waller
25 MR. WALLER: Good evening, Panel. I am Richard
0052
1 Waller. I live in Arroyo Grande. I'm the recent past
2 president of Back Country Horsemen of California, a 3,000
3 member organization, the only statewide organization
4 dedicated solely to trails. Tonight I am representing the
5 Back Country Horsemen of California, Los Padres Unit, 250
6 members here on the coast. And we are just a small
7 fraction of the number of equestrians that love to ride
8 trails.
9 I followed the process of putting the power
10 plant in this pristine coastline instead of the Nipomo
11 Mesa, as first proposed by PG&E back in the 1960s. That
12 location was successfully blocked and the section of coast
13 almost no one knew of was selected. I say "almost no
14 one." My grandfather farmed sweet peas on those
15 benchlands on the way out to the power plant back in the
16 1920s and 1930s. He leased the land. He knew the land.
17 As can be seen from the sea or from nearly any
18 viewpoint in our area, the Irish Hills are a scenic
19 resource of world-class beauty. Preserving this land for
20 public access, environmental protection with a network of
21 trails and campsites is the right thing to do.
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
22 The question of how to replace the economic
23 benefit of the parkland hangs over every discussion
24 regarding the area. Preserving this landscape as a park
25 -- and I use the "park" in a generic sense -- will have
0053
1 positive economic benefits for our county. My wife and I,
2 we travel overseas. We take long hikes in Switzerland, or
3 Italy, or Portugal, or Spain, and we spend our dollars.
4 This park will bring people in who will spend their
5 dollars and pounds and euros and yen here in our county.
6 The economic benefits of parks extend beyond tourism. The
7 greatest value of natural amenities and recreational
8 opportunities often lie in the ability of protected lands
9 to attract and retain people.
10 People move to our area to work, whether they
11 are doctors, or lawyers, or contractors because of the
12 scenic and open space opportunities that we have in our
13 county. Substantial percentages of counties in California
14 get income per capita based on public lands and visitors
15 to those areas. Over 15 percent of the jobs in San Luis
16 Obispo county are directly related to tourism. That
17 number would only go up if this area becomes a natural
18 resource for tourism.
19 I know you are not going to answer the question,
20 but I have a question. I trust the transmission lines and
21 the towers that stretch out across our county will also be
22 removed as part of the decommissioning process and we
23 won't have those. Thank you.
| Backcountry Horsemen of California, Los Padres Unit | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Don Conesto
12 MR. CONESTO: Hello. My name is Don Conesto,
13 and I'd like to thank you for your time and your efforts
14 in this endeavor. I am the director of the Ken Norris
15 Rancho Marino Reserve up in Cambria, California. I work
16 for the University of California Natural Reserve System.
17 The Natural Reserve System has 39 reserves throughout the
18 state and manages over 150,000 acres. Our mission is to
19 contribute to the wise understanding and management of the
20 earth, and we do that by facilitating university research
21 and education throughout many different habitats in this
22 state.
23 Been lucky, our 2 miles of coastline and
24 500 acres sort of parallels on a smaller scale the Diablo
25 Canyon area. It has coastal grasslands as well as the
0074
1 Monterey Pine Forest and the Bishop Pine Forest. I had
2 the pleasure of seeing Diablo Canyon lands with Bob
3 Blanchard, the rancher, and Sally Krenn, the biologist,
4 and have worked with Tenera folks, who is a marine
5 biologist by training. Anyway, I just want to put out
6 there that the University of California Natural Reserve
7 System may be a very good group to help with this
8 management of the lands of the Diablo Canyon when you
9 finally make a decision.
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
10 And I'd also like to invite you on a tour of the
11 reserve. So if you can get in touch with Sally, or
12 anybody, if you look at the reserve system, I'm there, and
13 I can show you how it works on a small scale at our place
14 and talk more about the whole system. But it's an option
15 for land management that differs from any other
16 organizations and has quite a bit of experience and
17 expertise statewide. So thank you very much for your time
18 and keep up the good work, and I look forward to seeing it
19 all resolved.
| UC Natural Reserve System | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Patrick McBibney
24 MR. McGIBNEY: Thank you, Panel. My name is
25 Patrick McGigney. I'm the CEO of Biodiversity First, a
0054
1 local 501C3 nonprofit organization. We work to preserve
2 and protect the wildlands and species upon which we depend
3 for our own physical and spiritual survival. Biodiversity
4 First recommends that all 1200 acres of lands around
5 Diablo Canyon be held in a public trust and into
6 perpetuity. Because we value the rich diversity of
7 wildlife and vegetation on this site, we recommend that
8 human access be limited to prescribed hiking trails,
9 parking at the entrance, no public roads, one coast trail
10 and one ridge trail that can connect to Montana de Oro
11 State Park, much like the Buchon Trail does. We recommend
12 that the Coast Trail have handicapped access.
13 We also recommend that the important wildlife
14 corridor that runs from Diablo Canyon lands to Montana de
15 Oro into Los Padres National Forest, remain undisturbed.
16 Mountain lions, bear, gray fox, bobcats, Black Hills deer,
17 wild turkey, possums, coyote, cottontail rabbits, and many
18 other species, thrive in this diverse ecosystem, and their
19 survival depends on our protection.
20 The Diablo Canyon lands are sacred to the
Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Public Engagement Panel
August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting
Public Comments
21 Chumash Nation, and Biodiversity First recommends that
22 every identified indigenous site be restricted from public
23 access. This beautiful land is one of the last
24 undeveloped swaths of coastland in California. And
25 residents of the Central Coast and all of California have
0055
1 had to live with the danger of the nuclear power plant
2 built on earthquake faults for the past 30 years.
3 Biodiversity First recommends that PG&E donate all of the
4 land into a public trust, possible State Parks, for
5 perpetual conservation. Thank you.
| Biodiversity First | | | |
August 29, 2018 | Lands | Kimberly Perez
20 MS. PEREZ: Hi. Thank you, everyone. It's
21 late. I know you guys are ready to go, probably. Just a
22 few more of us to speak. My name is Kimberly Perez and
23 I'm associated with Pacific Wildlife Care, and I am the
24 president. I just want to thank all of you for your time,
25 and again, PG&E for bringing the community into these
0075
1 negotiations to review and recommend for future use of
2 those lands and facilities.
3 So we attended the first day of the
4 presentation, and it was exciting to hear the unified
5 response to conservation of those lands. We are advocates
6 for wildlife, Pacific Wildlife Care is. And so the
7 critical envirohabitat is very important for their
8 survival. We see firsthand the effects of wildlife that's
9 affected through development day to day, just every day in
10 our facility. So keeping these lands wild to the extent
11 possible with some public access is a really good plan.
12 We are very interested in the facilities, and so
13 we hope to give a presentation in September, but I want to
14 thank everyone again. I'm not going to take much more
15 time. Thanks.
| Pacific Wildlife Care | | | |